Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 8301 - 8320 of 29,832
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2017, 11:33 am by Lisa Ramsey
§ 1052(f) if they acquire distinctiveness through use in connection with the advertising and sale of products. [read post]
PlayWood Toys, Inc., 342 F.3d 714, 730 (7th Cir. 2003) (applying the Illinois Uniform Trade Secret Act). [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
They summarily reversed an appeals court grant of habeas corpus relief to a criminal defendant in Jenkins v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 8:56 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
Sessions to explain when the DOJ will begin to seek the rescission or re-direction of settlement payments “[i]f such a procedure is consistent with law and the Department’s authority. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 3:26 am
McIntosh, 833 F.3d 1163, 1169-70 (9th Cir. 2016), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decided “whether criminal defendants may avoid prosecution for various federal marijuana offenses on the basis of a congressional appropriations rider [sometimes called the Rohrabacher-Farr Amendment] that prohibits the United States Department of Justice from spending funds to prevent states’ implementation of their own medical marijuana laws. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 7:35 am by Neumann Law Group
In Count I, a negligence claim, he alleged that the defendants breached their duties to the son by:  (a) interrogating him in a closed room without his parents or counsel; (b) misrepresenting facts to him during their interrogation; (c) intimidating him; (d) lying to him about the videotape showing him in possession of the laptop; (e) threatening him about a felony conviction and his future college plans; (f) suspending him for the remainder of the school year; and (g)… [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 12:30 pm by Orin Kerr
Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 (1906); In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72 (2d Cir. 1973) (Friendly, J.). [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 11:59 am
The Paris Tribunal thus concluded that the defendants' bona fide defense could not hold, and did not form a legitimate or serious claim susceptible to prevent expedited proceedings (p. 7). [read post]