Search for: "House v. State" Results 8301 - 8320 of 25,143
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am by NFS Esq.
Housing Authority (1988) 200 Cal.App.3d 635 (Hanif),[1] Hamilton argued that because only the amounts paid by plaintiff and her insurer could be recovered, the larger amounts billed by the providers were irrelevant and should be excluded. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am by Dave
 The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 9:34 am by chief
This funding would only need to be repaid if Islington's housing stock was transferred to a housing association. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 9:34 am by chief
This funding would only need to be repaid if Islington's housing stock was transferred to a housing association. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 4:32 am by Legal Beagle
But it also states that when the action was raised, £8,000 of fees from one invoice were outstanding from one partner’s accounts. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 7:10 am
The majority in Kelo emphasized that nothing in its decision prevented states from placing restrictions upon the exercise of eminent domain specifically through state statutes or constitutional interpretations as to what qualifies as a "public use. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 3:25 pm
In 2011 - the Colorado State Legislature added some important matters to the preparation of the sentencing pre-sentence report. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat and Dennis Aftergut
That is the threat posed by state power in our century. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 6:49 pm by Stephen Bilkis
" The July 31,1998 letter further states:" You may within thirty (30) calendar days of the receipt of this denial, appeal to the Assistant Commissioner of HPD — The [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:21 am by Adam Baker
A typical lump sum price was required for one portion of the project (the pump house and a few other items). [read post]