Search for: "Matter of Thomas" Results 8301 - 8320 of 11,400
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm by Amy Howe
” Alito, joined by Thomas, also penned a statement regarding the denial of review in Thompson v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
The current Supreme Court has at least two members who seem strongly influenced by originalist constitutional theory--Associate Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas and two others, John Roberts and Samuel Alito who may also be receptive to originalist arguments. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 9:38 am by Josh Blackman
If I had to guess, the four were Justices Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh. [read post]
8 Oct 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
On September 6, 2024, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) charged Esmark Inc. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
The current Supreme Court has at least three members who seem strongly influenced by originalist constitutional theory--Associate Justices Amy Coney Barrett, Neil Gorsuch, and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 9:33 am
Thomas by email (at roxanastthomas@gmail.com), follow her on Twitter, or find her on Facebook. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 11:11 am by Eugene Volokh
But, no matter the approach taken, we all agree that the names clause does not violate the First Amendment. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Among the matters cited in the mem: a panel about book bans, and two events featuring queer, trans, and nonbinary writers. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
As for Sarah Palin, the vilification was not a matter of her alleged ordinariness but a matter of her stupidity. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 12:30 pm by Eugene Volokh
" … Applicability to Real Parties in Interest As a threshold matter, we must address whether CSI, as a real party in interest, may pursue anti-SLAPP relief. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:57 am by Michelle Yeary
  General jurisdiction allows a court to hear any claims in any matter about anything against a defendant because the defendant’s “affiliations with the State are so “continuous and systematic” as to render them essentially at home in the forum State. [read post]
5 May 2023, 9:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Plaintiff's claims against The Times defendants, as an initial matter, fail as a matter of constitutional law. [read post]
6 May 2012, 11:52 am by Schachtman
  (citing and quoting Thomas Starkie, et al., A Practical Treatise of the Law of Evidence and Digest of Proofs in Civil and Criminal Proceedings vol. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 5:58 am
Jeffrey Segal and Harold Spaeth, the leading attitudinal scholars of this generation, designed a study to respond to their critics who said that law matters to Supreme Court decision making. [read post]