Search for: "People v Johns" Results 8301 - 8320 of 9,055
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2022, 6:29 am by Ryan Goodman
Bolton, in an interview, mentioned a letter that Trump had gotten from the North Korean leader and said that ‘John Kelly took it from him and we put it back in the right place. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 8:28 am by Scott R. Anderson
In August 2021, just days after the fall of Kabul, a set of September 11th plaintiffs who received a judgment in the matter of John Does 1 through 7 v. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 9:00 pm by Gideon
It can remind us to be better people, to engage in public service and to help others who are not as fortunate. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 6:18 am
(John Knox) November 11, 2017Professor John Knox,Special Rapporteur on Human Rights and the EnvironmentOffice of the UN High Commissioner for Human RightsOHCHR-Palais Wilson, United Nations Office at GenevaCH-1211 Geneva 10, SwitzerlandDear Professor Knox,We welcome the invitation, extended in a letter from the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, dated 11th October 2016, to provide comments on the Draft Guidelines on Human Rights and the Environment.We believe a… [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:38 pm by Ilya Shapiro - Guest
*Before I go further, let me explain that I use the term “Obamacare” simply because people colloquially refer to it that way – probably because it’s easier to say than “PPACA,” “Affordable Care Act,” or any other more cognate. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of visiting Professor Jack Goldsmith’s “Foreign Relations Law” class, which is studying Hamdan v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:23 pm by Amy Howe
” Chief Justice John Roberts kicked off the questioning by asking Strawbridge to clarify his argument: Does Trump contend that that the House of Representatives can never subpoena the president’s personal papers, or does he agree that it might have the power to do so in at least some cases? [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:13 am by INFORRM
We know from cases such as Mosley, McKennit v Ash and Naomi Campell that it covers the publication of information that is obviously private, such as that pertaining to health, medical treatment, sexual life, private finance and family life. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm by dirklasater
He's not just saying it would be a good idea to amend the law so there are penalties for copyfraud — many people say that. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Pam Samuelson: legislative changes/courts v. legislators? [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
Over thirty years ago, Chief Justice Dickson for the Supreme Court of Canada stated in Action Travail des Femmes v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 9:30 am by Jordan Brunner
Senator John McCain (R-AZ), chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, has said that“nobody knows who’s in charge, and nobody knows who’s setting policy. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:20 am by Lloyd J. Jassin
A Fleeting Opportunity to Terminate Publishing Contracts They say that with every  contract, the truth is in the details. [read post]