Search for: "State v. Record"
Results 8301 - 8320
of 43,403
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2019, 1:04 pm
Google, Doe v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 3:59 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 12:16 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 4:14 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 12:56 pm
v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 9:09 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 May 2012, 9:01 pm
State v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 5:23 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 12:55 pm
Gutierrez v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 9:34 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 9:15 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 6:20 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:52 pm
State v. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 7:19 am
Norris, 16 U.S.C.M.A. 574, 37 C.M.R. 194 (to be admissible, must be verbatim); United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 4:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:51 am
Nicholas Bronni serves as the solicitor general for the state of Arkansas, which co-authored an amicus brief joined by 14 other states supporting the government in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 2:14 pm
And I'm not 100% sure about this, but the only use of this phrase in all of recorded American jurisprudence before this opinion is its use by non-lawyers and non-judges; in particular, by a gang leader in Texas when pleading guilty ("I conspired to commit murder against other DMI members for sanction, violations and so forth. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 2:45 pm
That justification is only minimally supported by the record and, tellingly, S.B. 1070’s introduction says nothing about traffic safety. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 12:16 pm
" It does so on the basis of the reasoning of the Eighth Circuit that "[a]n affidavit filed long after the events in question have occurred tends to be less trustworthy than a promptly-recorded statement because the passage of time dulls memories. [read post]
