Search for: "United States v. Little" Results 8301 - 8320 of 10,421
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2007, 1:00 am
(IP Thinktank); 3M reaches global settlement over lithium battery patents with Sanyo (IP Law 360),ACTA - The United States, European Union and other key trading partners on Tuesday announced their intention to negotiate an Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) to encourage other countries to meet higher intellectual property rights enforcement standards: (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (IP Law Daily), Pharmaceutical Lifecycle Management and IP Acquisitions: (IP… [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 1:10 am
  Sometimes, as here, it comes down to one Assistant United States Attorney deciding that he is going to teach defense counsel a lesson because he's pissed. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 11:35 am by Jonathan Bailey
In the United States, a registration with the U.S. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 3:36 am by SHG
Adam Liptak, in his Sidebar column, writes about Todd Crespi, an artist whose carved out a niche at the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 11:17 am by Jonathan Bailey
This is especially true for essay mills, most of which are based outside the United States. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm by Bexis
  It ascribes this result to two factors:  (1) “[p]arity may exist because state courts almost always mimic federal courts” on preemption, and/or (2) “the exception created by the 'parallel’ requirements language of Riegel is so narrow that lower courts have very little discretion. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 7:16 pm
By reading Justice Blackmun's infamous dictum in Jones v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 11:57 pm by Florian Mueller
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) of the United States has won the first round of litigation against Qualcomm. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" This basic principle, namely that the requirement of probable cause to permit entry into a private home is not excused based upon any relative perceived societal importance, was further articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Mincey v. [read post]
30 Oct 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
United States (1951), justified the restriction of unpopular political groups like communists during the Red Scare. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:07 am by David Hart QC, 1 Crown Office Row
Instead of deciding that there should be a statutory compensation scheme backed by the state (as per a very limited English version) , the law decided that pleural plaques amounted to bodily injury. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 11:46 pm
The Supreme Court explained the reason underlying the indefiniteness doctrine 60 years ago in United Carbon Co. v. [read post]