Search for: "Defendants A-F"
Results 8321 - 8340
of 29,832
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2017, 8:30 am
Cal. 2002), aff’d, 45 F. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 8:30 am
Cal. 2002), aff’d, 45 F. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 11:01 am
El acuerdo fue suscrito por la Jueza Presidenta, la licenciada Santini Colberg y el licenciado Félix Vélez Alejandro, Director Ejecutivo de la SAL. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:14 am
The defendant explained that the DTSA has a three year statute of limitations and contains language that provides: “[f]or purposes of this subsection, a continuing misappropriation constitutes a single claim of misappropriation. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am
Section 512(f) allows a user to recover damages from a copyright owner that “knowingly misrepresents” in a takedown notice that material is infringing. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 8:27 am
The plaintiffs again sought Rule 23(f) review. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 6:50 am
Bandemer; (4) whether the defendants are entitled, at a minimum, to present additional evidence showing that they would have prevailed under the district court’s test, which the court announced only after the record had closed; and (5) whether partisan-gerrymandering claims are justiciable. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 5:49 am
Wells Fargo, 797 F.3d 160 (2d Cir. 2015), the Second Circuit said that "The proper time for a plaintiff to move to amend the complaint is when the plaintiff learns from the District Court in what respect the complaint is deficient. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 1:16 am
Sony Music Entertainment, Inc., 320 F. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 10:00 pm
Avila responded by saying “F— you! [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 8:19 pm
Sanchez-Gomez, — F.3d —, 2017 WL 2346995 (9th Cir. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 1:44 pm
But in some contexts defendants may not welcome such an individual trial because of concerns about collateral estoppel. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 1:44 pm
But in some contexts defendants may not welcome such an individual trial because of concerns about collateral estoppel. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 12:33 pm
., at 12).In Fox, a prevailing defendant sought reimbursement under a fee-shifting statute for legal expenses incurred in defending against several frivolous claims. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 10:18 am
P. 23(f). [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 10:04 am
” The opinion emphasizes that the most important consideration – “‘[o]f prime significance to the jurisdictional issue before us’” – is the likelihood that the “tactic [will] undercu[t] Rule 23(f)’s discretionary regime. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 9:30 am
The 9th reverses a conviction, and remands, because the district court precluded the defendant from arguing that he had not posted a "notice" or an "advertisement" seeking or offering child porn on a "closed" restricted computer illegible board.The government prosecuted the defendant under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 5:16 am
Yesterday the U.S. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:00 am
David F. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 1:53 pm
Co., 190 F. [read post]
