Search for: "House v. House"
Results 8321 - 8340
of 41,244
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2020, 8:40 am
This opens up the possibility of the loom operator providing the essential craftsmanship contribution to the work.The judge reviewed the cases, from Hensher v Restawile (1976) to Vermaat v Boncrest (2001), not to mention Lucasfilm (2008), concluding that the Hensher court (the House of Lords, remember) would have found against the present claimant: the fabric was not a work of artistic craftsmanship - the craftsmanship element being lacking. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 5:57 am
’ Indeed, Big Brother Watch, Amnesty International, and the House of Commons Science and Technology Select Committee have all stated that FRT should be halted until ‘proper regulation’ that ‘explicitly regulates’ the technology is in place. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 1:08 pm
The House first passed an equal rights amendment in 1970. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 11:39 am
Todays’s case is Dion Johnson v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 8:00 am
Andrews v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 6:54 am
" (Bonz Group (Pty) Ltd v Cooke [1994] 3 N.Z.L.R. 216). [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 4:13 am
Corp., 262 AD2d 436, 436 [2d Dept 1999]; Polzer v TRW, Inc., 256 AD2d 248, 248 [1st Dept 1998]; Banque Nationale de Paris v 1567 Broadway Ownership Assocs., 214 AD2d 359, 360 [1st Dept 1995]; see also Sullivan v MERS, Inc., 139 AD3d 419, 420 [1st Dept 2016]; Burger v Singh, 28 AD3d 695, 697-698 [2d Dept 2006]), there is no basis for imposing such a duty on Grover & Fensterstock based on its acting as Live Well’s attorney (Chemical… [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 2:58 am
[Mike Rappaport, Law and Liberty] Tags: Article V, constitutional law, Virginia [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 8:52 pm
., keeping in office people who, by stipulation, a majority of the House and even a majority (though not 2/3) of the Senate may agree, on the basis of preponderance or even "clear and convincing" evidence, should be bounced. [read post]
Potential Extension of the Statutes of Limitation and Repose for Colorado Construction Defect Claims
29 Jan 2020, 10:06 am
” Smith v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 3:30 am
Comer (2017) and Zelman v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 1:14 am
Meanwhile, the non-biological parent could adopt the child (See for a confirmation ECtHR, C and E v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm
The story of Justice v. [read post]
Defamation Act 2013: A summary and overview six years on, Part 1, Sections 1 to 3 – Brett Wilson LLP
28 Jan 2020, 4:39 pm
Following the Supreme Court’s decision in Lachaux, it will often be best to leave the matter for trial (see, for example, Steyn J, in James v Saunders [2019] EWHC 3265 (QB) at [16]-[17]), although as indicated by Warby J in Hamilton v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2020] EWHC 59 (QB) there will be cases where the issue can sensibly be dealt with at a preliminary trial. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 2:55 pm
Davies v Scott, 24 October 2019, Mayors & City County Court . [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 2:55 pm
Davies v Scott, 24 October 2019, Mayors & City County Court . [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 2:30 pm
The case below, State of New York et al. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 1:15 pm
But a number of the most controversial content moderation decisions made by Facebook in recent years have been decisions to leave content up, not take it down: Think of the Nancy Pelosi cheapfake video in which footage of the speaker of the House was edited misleadingly so that she appeared intoxicated, or hate speech in Myanmar, or the years that Facebook hosted content from Infowars chief Alex Jones before finally deciding to follow Apple’s lead and remove Jones’s material. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 9:58 am
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit’s NLRB v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 9:02 am
Additional Resources: Brome v. [read post]
