Search for: "In re E.G."
Results 8321 - 8340
of 13,708
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2012, 4:33 am
When your KM system depends on a cutting-edge technology, you’re building in planned obsolesce that will become painfully apparent as that technology becomes outmoded. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 5:45 am
But by the time they're teenagers they surely do. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 8:57 am
If you're not a techie, this stuff may seem like inside baseball to you. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 1:52 pm
Work to obtain or re-instate Housing Benefit is out of scope, see paragraph 15 of Part 2, Schedule 1 of LASPO. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 2:17 pm
See, e.g., Omnicare, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 1:45 pm
(Full disclosure: I am a card-carrying feminist, which is no surprise to those of you who have read some of my other posts, e.g. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 9:28 am
From last week's decision of the Federal Circuit (Judges Timothy Dyk, Evan Wallach, and Kara Stoll) in In re Violation of Revised Protocols for In-Person Arguments: Under the in-person [COVID-related] argument protocols in effect during the events here, "[o]nly arguing counsel and no more than one attendee whose presence is necessary to assist or supervise arguing counsel (e.g., a client, lawyer sitting second chair, or paralegal)" [and who were both either… [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 11:09 am
" See, e.g., "'Naked Rambler' Insists on Rambling Naked," Lowering the Bar (Dec. 1, 2012). [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 7:14 pm
Many Patent Owners are now learning that losing at the PTAB could mean that related prosecution (e.g., continuations, reexamination, and reissue) is estopped. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 12:32 pm
This ultimately requires process re-engineering. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:27 am
But a lesson we can all (re)learn from this case is that proffers to the government in criminal cases can have a huge downside and should not be entered into lightly. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:24 pm
The problem is that we're hiring people with Ph.D.s in other fields, but their law credentials are middling at best. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 9:00 pm
I cringed deeply early yesterday afternoon -- on Ram Dass's birthday -- when witnessing the following in McLean, Virginia: Some police officers were re-directing traffic away from a closed stretch of road. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 8:00 pm
In the cases where criminal asset networks remain untouched, the 2001-2007 data in this paper show that criminal groups will simply react to higher expected punishments by re-assigning their relatively untouched financial resources to expanding their rings (scope and scale) of violence and of corruption to higher levels of the public sectors in order to protect themselves. [read post]
26 Jan 2008, 11:22 pm
"The cartels know we're better trained, better equipped and not as corruptible as our Mexican counterparts," [Hidalgo County] Sheriff [Guadalupe] Trevino said. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 11:23 am
Ortiz, if re-convicted, could, of course, receive up to life in prison. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 5:31 am
I am happy to see that it has picked up some steam and is being put to good use by some folks who know what they’re doing.) [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 9:19 pm
If anything is broken (e.g., a leaking roof, garage door that won’t open, cracked tiles, blocked gutters), put these on top of the list. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 4:40 am
You're not seriously considering anyone for this position who didn't attend Harvard or Yale, are you? [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 4:04 pm
See, e.g., “Sentence Enhancement Imposed for Bullshit” (July 27, 2005). [read post]
