Search for: "United States v. California" Results 8321 - 8340 of 13,840
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2013, 12:00 pm by Karen Tani
Leading scholars will offer brief reflections on the long history of black freedom movements, their significance to United States history more generally, and their relevance for today. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 10:47 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Our advice is to rest up and enjoy the break as there are five cases pending before the California Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
On April 16, 2013 at noon Pacific, the Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law Section and the Labor and Employment Law Section of the State Bar of California will jointly present a webinar called "Comcast v. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 1:13 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 11:31 am by Sheppard Mullin
Rodriguez, 628 F.3d 1258, (11th Cir. 2010)); and a recruiter in California who downloaded customer lists to start a competing business (United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 11:17 am
Although the Meso Scale Diagnostics decision confirms, at least under Delaware law, the long-standing view of many practitioners that a reverse triangular merger does not result in an assignment by operation of law, it does not directly affect the contrary position taken by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in SQL Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 11:15 am
Rodriguez, 628 F.3d 1258, (11th Cir. 2010)); and a recruiter in California who downloaded customer lists to start a competing business (United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 11:00 am by Michelle Yeary
United States, 335 U.S. 345 (1950) (“One article or thing is accompanied by another when it supplements or explains it . . . [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 9:41 am
Back on June 28, 2012, Stockton filed a petition seeking to adjust its debts under Chapter 9 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by David S. Kemp
Supreme Court’s decision in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm by Bexis
  Use of the drug took place in a military context:  everyone in the decedent’s unit took an antimalarial drug before shipping to Afghanistan. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 12:21 pm by Eric P. Robinson
This is a new innovation in the United States, with only a few cases like Rio Props. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 9:01 am by Rachel Sachs
Perry and United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:53 am by Kevin LaCroix
  On April 3, 2013, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois issued the first federal court decision on this issue in Noble v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 7:46 pm by Kirk Jenkins
In state and Federal courts throughout the country, the defense and plaintiffs’ bars are debating the application of the United States Supreme Court’s landmark 2011 decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 11:57 am by Cormac Early
Perry and United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:35 am by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]