Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 8321 - 8340
of 10,394
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2010, 10:25 am
Yogubliz filed the action in the United States District Court for the Central District of California seeking a declaratory judgment that its BLIZZBERRY and BLIZZ FROZEN YOGURT marks did not infringe DQ’s BLIZZARD marks. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 3:00 am
United States Postal Service, [985 F.2d 440, 442 (8th Cir. 1993)]; Kreppein v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 2:50 am
City of Philadelphia, Medina v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 10:28 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 6:20 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 5:11 am
United States, 294 U.S. 330 (1935); Nortz v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 4:16 am
The district court agreed because there had been no "injury-in-fact" to the United States. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:45 pm
– SKARB KIBICA trade mark dispute(Class 46) Similarity of signs, homogenity of goods – ALT ATLANTIC word-figurative mark case (Class 46) The average consumers’ confusion – ALFOFARM TM dispute(Class 46) South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal confirms territoriality of IP rights in Gallo Africa v Sting Music (Afro-IP) Seeing Red: colour marks case Henkel AG v Trefoil Manufacturing (Pty) Ltd (Afro-IP) Spain… [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 8:06 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Timothy S. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 12:20 am
In Sutton v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 10:40 pm
The People) US Trade Marks & Domain Names Lessons in smart trademark management: Free licensing of the mark from Twitter (Techdirt) [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 6:34 am
I doubt whether any scholar could do as well.I will devote two subsequent posts to Justice Breyer's book, one to his discussion of United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 5:01 pm
See Groupon, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 1:55 pm
The district court held that Stauffer did lack standing to assert a false marking claim because he had not sufficiently alleged an injury in fact to the United States or to himself. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 6:27 am
Arthur Andersen LLP, closing a loophole that had been opened and expanded by the United States District Courts in California, which had allowed the enforcement of noncompetes in certain circumstances. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 2:30 am
The Respondent in Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. ll, FA1007001336979 (Nat. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 2:59 am
v=idAUo_fyHW4 His explanation starts at about the two-minute mark.3. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 12:42 am
United States (271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Gray on Claims) (IPBiz) (IPBiz) (PatLit) CAFC: Another means-plus-function opinion: General Protecht Group, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 1:00 pm
State v. [read post]
