Search for: "GUESS v. GUESS"
Results 8341 - 8360
of 8,735
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2020, 2:28 pm
Policymakers in Europe and around the world are currently pursuing two reasonable-sounding goals for platform regulation. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 3:02 pm
Co. v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 1:58 am
Less noise, more signal.These are the three most important appeals going on at this stage (in no particular order):Oracle's copyrightability-centric Android/Java appealGoogle's appeal of the FRAND part of Judge Posner's rulingApple's appeal of Judge Koh's denial of a permanent injunction against SamsungThe third one is the one I will focus on for the remainder of this post.The key issues of transcendental relevance in the Apple v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 10:40 am
Why they were enamored of Russia is anyone’s guess; I presume it had something to do with President Trump. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:38 am
(I guess that's what Larry Ellison meant.)Let's again talk about what the focus of this blog is for the most part, intellectual property. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 12:21 pm
“The terms natural and organic have long been used across the country to convey products’ health benefits” (citing, inter alia, a court relying on its own “common sense,” so I guess an Article III commission can indeed be swapped for a Ph.D. in some circumstances). [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 10:00 am
The opinion in Gilliland v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 3:04 pm
Up to $8000 per work—the statute says up to $150,000, but a jury has awarded that in Capitol Records v. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 3:39 am
First, the enactment of the Fourth Amendment was largely a response to a few high-profile English cases on general warrants, such as Entick v. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 8:17 pm
But the object of the law should not be to make people guess as to its scope. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 4:00 am
It is the face of Dred Scott v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 3:11 pm
Bita Amani, Some More Equal Than Others: Critical Contexts for the (False) Promises of Intellectual Property Rights IP and sustainable development goals: What is equality itself? [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 5:42 am
Earlier this week on SCOTUSblog, I published a post recounting the legal travails of Muhammad Ali after he refused induction into military service in 1967--culminating in the Supreme Court's 1971 ruling in his favor on the appeal of his criminal conviction shortly after he lost to Joe Frazier in the "Fight of the Century. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 1:19 pm
By Nicole KilloranClarke v. [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 6:44 pm
Absent the double jeopardy rule applicable in the criminal context, the balance of interests in such a case would make it deeply perverse to say “Well, I guess he got us; the legal system’s general interest in settlement and repose means that in this case, we need to leave a president known to be treasonous in command of the U.S. military. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 1:40 pm
In Dominguez v. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Part V identifies key unresolved issues in the state courts. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 7:23 am
A caveat is in order, however: On some of these matters, our assessment is merely a best guess. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 10:22 am
Jeff Fisher: The big headliner was a case called Rahimi v. [read post]
