Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 8341 - 8360
of 8,963
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2008, 3:42 pm
Opinion below (2nd Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Amicus brief of the United States (in support of the petitioners) Amicus brief of Hayward D. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 1:10 pm
The United States agrees that Rule 32 requires a district court to provide notice, but argues that the failure to do so in this case was harmless error. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 7:24 am
The principles laid down by the United States Supreme Court such as "suspect legislation", "strict scrutiny" and "compelling State necessity" are not applicable for challenging the validity of Act 5 of 2007 or reservations or other affirmative action contemplated under Article 15(5) of the Constitution.Pasayat J:132. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 11:26 am
United States. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Bartee, No. 07-1526 Denial of habeas corpus relief from a conviction for, inter alia, armed assault with intent to kill is affirmed where, regardless of whether petitioner defaulted on claims due to Massachusetts contemporaneous objection rule or whether the state ruling was contrary to or constituted an unreasonable application of federal law, he was unable to show the indispensable habeas requirement of "prejudice" under Brecht v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 8:05 am
F-1 students generally are not authorized to work in the United States during the term of their educational program, with limited exceptions. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 1:35 pm
United States, No. 07-1248. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 5:15 am
" Brief for Technology Network as Amici Curiae Supporting Petitioners, Friese, 127 S. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 3:01 am
The habeas petitioner, Wong (left), had been born in San Francisco to Chinese immigrant parents, yet was denied re-entry into the United States, after a visit to China, on grounds that he was not a U.S. citizen and that the Chinese Exclusion Act barred him from entering as an immigrant. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 8:19 am
United States Issue: Whether, under the Due Process Clause, a defendant who pleads guilty retains the right to appeal a pre-trial competency determination. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 9:16 am
Greg Garre, arguing for the United States, spent a good portion of his time attempting to defend the Government's assertion that the habeas statute does not apply at all when the United States is acting in its capacity as part of a multinational force. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 9:57 pm
Medellin v Texas,(March 25, 2008), the United States Supreme Court ruled that President Bush did not have authority to require the State of Texas to enforce the Vienna Convention. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:25 pm
J. 12, nor a memorandum issued by the President of the United States constitutes directly enforceable federal law that pre-empts state limitations on the filing of successive habeas petitions. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:09 pm
Johnson , No. 07-10 In a proceeding seeking post-conviction relief for conviction of capital murder and robbery, denial of petitioner's writ of habeas corpus is affirmed over claims of ineffective assistance of counsel based on a failure to seek public funds for a DNA expert, as well as a failure to investigate and present mitigating evidence. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 8:40 am
No. 128 Judgment of Mar. 31, 2004), the International Court of Justice determined that 51 named Mexican nationals, including petitioner, were entitled to receive review and reconsideration of their convictions and sentences through the judicial process in the United States without regard for procedural defaults. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 5:32 am
Based on this ruling, respondent filed a civil action in the United States Court for the District of Utah, against the individual officers and the task force. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 9:01 pm
., the Court is scheduled to hear argument in United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 2:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 9:26 am
As Justice Kennedy put it in Rasul: "Guantanamo Bay is in every practical respect a United States territory. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 7:11 am
United States, 494 U.S. 152, 158 (1990); United States v. [read post]
