Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 8341 - 8360
of 13,840
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2013, 11:45 am
Perry (challenging California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 2:56 am
America’s Best Franchising, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 1:56 am
The post-trial, post-damages-ruling procedures in the first Apple v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 11:40 am
Late Monday, Samsung filed with a federal court in California, showing that the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) had issued a “Final Office Action” on Apple’s ‘381 patent (commonly known as the “bounce-back” patent), reaffirming that patent’s invalidation. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 9:13 pm
And a final-final USPTO decision can then be appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 5:57 pm
[Marietta Drapery & Window Coverings Co., Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 1:35 pm
So now we have Brazil v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 10:04 am
By Michael Hansen On February 22, California State Assembly Member Toni Atkins, D-San Diego, introduced a bill, AB 1229, to restore the ability of California cities and counties to require affordable housing as part of market-rate housing developments. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 10:19 pm
Artistic and legal minds want to know "Does the California Resale Right Act (the "Act") violate the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, U.S. [read post]
30 Mar 2013, 1:34 am
It's now official that a new Apple v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 12:39 pm
Snow has melted, but campers still braving the cold for second day of arguments at Supreme Court On Wednesday, the Court heard arguments in the federal Defense of Marriage Act, United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 10:44 am
The Sad State of Indigent Defense 50 Years after Gideon v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 9:49 am
Navasca, United Stated District Court for the Northern District of California, No. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 7:47 am
Here is our guide to the amici (we’ve highlighted the must-read briefs in red): The United States: Here. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 6:38 am
Yet, states like California started governing its use as far back as 1996. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 5:49 am
Navasca, United Stated District Court for the Northern District of California, No. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 12:46 pm
This didn’t please the FDA, which sent a warning letter to AMARC, stating that since Poly-MVA isn’t FDA-approved, the customer testimonials essentially falsify the product as approved.Here's the letter:HomeInspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal InvestigationsEnforcement ActionsWarning LettersEnforcement ActionsWarning Letters2012-Amarc Enterprises 12/11/12Department of Health and Human ServicesPublic Health ServiceFood and Drug AdministrationLos Angeles… [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 7:32 am
Yesterday, in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 6:33 pm
In United States v Windsor (Dkt No 12-307), the petitioner contends that DOMA has denied gays and lesbians who have been allowed to marry lawfully in certain states all of the benefits and protections that married couples enjoy under federal law. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 6:10 pm
The written transcript and audio recording of Wednesday's arguments in United States v. [read post]
