Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 8341 - 8360 of 10,394
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2010, 11:41 pm by Kelly
File for harassment (TorrentFreak) United States US Patents – Decisions Federal Circuit holds-line on patent misuse defense: Princo Corp. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 9:00 pm
Lesson two: The United States thankfully has not gotten as bad as European countries and other countries that require people to carry identification papers. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 1:20 pm by Phil
In doing so, the Federal Circuit established broad standing for private individuals seeking to pursue qui tam actions for false patent marking on behalf of the United States. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 2:29 am by gmlevine
UDRP is not centric to any particular national law, but where the parties are “domiciled in the United States and United States courts have recent experience with similar disputes … the Sole Panelist shall look to rules and principles of law set out in decisions of the courts of the United States,” EAuto, L.L.C. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:55 am
  Half the monetary penalty goes to the person who instituted the suit and the other half goes to the United States government. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:00 am
On August 31, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its decision in Stauffer v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 10:55 am by INFORRM
In Attorney-General v Guardian Newspapers Limited (No 2) [1990] 1 AC 109 Lord Keith stated that “the right to personal privacy is clearly one in which the law in this field should seek to protect. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 4:14 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
(b) Any person may sue for the penalty, in which event one-half shall go to the person suing and the other to the use of the United States. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 2:17 am by gmlevine
The Complainant in Streetwise Maps located in the United States (Florida) alleges that Respondent (located in the U.K.) is a competitor in the market it serves. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 2:17 am by gmlevine
The similarity must be confusing to an “objective bystander,” so stated by the minority Panel in Open Society Institute v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 1:17 am by Kelly
Newegg (EDTexweblog.com) District Court Delaware: Plaintiff’s marking of packaging instead of products precludes pre-suit damages: Belden Technologies Inc. et al v. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 8:03 pm by Public Protection Lawyer
The United States District Court for Eastern California threw Alexis out of Court and she appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]