Search for: "Case v. People"
Results 8361 - 8380
of 51,436
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2025, 1:20 pm
Something that the City, which is staffed by a legion of reasonable people, would know as well.Is is possible that Grimm saw the tickets, read them, put them back, and simply figured "Ah, heck, I'm sure this will turn out just fine for me? [read post]
3 May 2007, 2:08 pm
But a parallel process has been a dumbing-down of the criteria for obtaining patents in the US, and the latest decision will help correct this distortion.IPBiz notes that the article considered the invention in the KSR v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 11:07 am
People v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 2:24 am
In the decision of 9 July 2013 in BMS v Teva [2013] EWHC 1958, Mr Justice Birss assumed the role of the "remember when you..." parent in respect of Teva's launch plans. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 7:58 am
2.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:44 pm
So you might think that people like Apodaca would be thankful that he only got two years in prison, as opposed to eight or nine. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 9:35 pm
This is a 1983 case for rich people. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 5:19 am
People v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 4:11 am
Meanwhile you may want to have a look at section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985. court cases landlord v tennants Yup, we’ve got those here. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 2:49 pm
Implementation: The new act is located in a brand-new “Subchapter V” at 11 USC ss. 1181 through s. 1195. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 1:25 pm
It's an important case. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 2:11 pm
The case is Jasna Kuhar v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 2:47 pm
The case was remanded for a new trial. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 2:08 pm
In R. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 7:00 am
People v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 10:34 am
The RIAA has commenced yet another case targeting University of Maine Students, BMG v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 5:57 am
Yet in two prominent cases, Kennedy v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
Among the cases still partially remembered, cited, and celebrated is R v Drybones, the only instance in which the Supreme Court of Canada rendered legislation inoperative under the Bill of Rights. [read post]
28 May 2018, 9:30 pm
A more restrained decision from the Court could have produced a less divisive regime that provided greater legal protections for people claimed as fugitive slaves. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 12:19 pm
Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
