Search for: "Grant v. State"
Results 8361 - 8380
of 68,540
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2021, 8:02 pm
The BIA in C-V-T stated that the factors that the immigration judge must consider when deciding whether to grant cancellation of removal to a lawful permanent resident are as follows: The positive factors are: Family ties in the United States, particularly ties to lawful permanent residents or U.S. citizens; Residence of long duration in the U.S. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 6:01 pm
By reference to general principles on contracts of indemnity and specific policy wordings, Justice Jagot made a distinction between the Commonwealth Government’s JobKeeper payments, franchise relief and rent relief received, and other Commonwealth and State government grants. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 1:41 pm
Supreme Court Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2021-2022update.html Two petitions for certiorari were granted this week on 10/18/21: Denezpi v. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 12:13 pm
The authority to regulate admission and thus to grant licenses to practice law is created either by state statute or (less frequently) by rule of the highest state court. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 11:56 am
Terkel v. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 10:10 am
The following remain acceptable as proof of vaccination: (i) the CDC vaccination card, (ii) a photo of a vaccination card as a separate document, (iii) a photo of the a vaccination card stored on a phone or electronic device, (iv) documentation of vaccination from a healthcare provider, (v) written self-attestation of vaccination signed under penalty of perjury, or (vi) a personal digital COVID-19 vaccine record issued by the State of California or similar documentation issued by… [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 10:05 am
From Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly's (D.D.C.) opinion in Lee v. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 9:38 am
From Does 1-6 v. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 4:58 am
A few days after Bail was granted, an immigration officer gave the Appellant a notice which stated that the Secretary of State had decided to now impose further restrictions, including that he “may not enter employment, paid or unpaid” and that he be subject to a curfew. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 7:13 pm
But the United States is not on better ground. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 12:11 pm
’ Heggs Slip op. at 10 (quoting State v. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 10:10 am
Jan. 27, 2016); Bartnett v. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 9:50 am
Wells Fargo v. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 9:00 am
On October 12, 2021, the United States District Court for the District of Maryland granted summary judgment to Defendant Schumacher & Seiler, Inc. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 4:30 pm
Today, the Department of Justice filed an emergency application with the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 2:45 pm
The first case is Denezpi v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 2:39 pm
In United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 2:28 pm
A. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:49 pm
Issue summary is from ScotusBlog, which also links to papers: Denezpi v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:04 pm
” The new request in United States v. [read post]
