Search for: "State v. Downs" Results 8361 - 8380 of 40,860
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2010, 3:13 pm
Answer: No, as a matter of law, according to a divided Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Rubio v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
On Sunday, a Florida federal district court struck down a state law requiring people with serious criminal convictions to pay court fines and fees before they can register to vote. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 4:56 am
Reno, which struck down the Communications Decency Act. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 6:52 am by Ashby Jones
Citizens United was fun; the Skilling argument provided a nice little walk down memory lane; but McDonald v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 12:10 am
We're pleased by the dismissal of Myers-Armstrong v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 7:03 am
  The result in New York State Board of Elections v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 3:35 pm by Simon Lester
Continuing with my occasional (although becoming somewhat frequent) posts on NAFTA Chapter 11 non-discrimination standards, there is a new decision to talk about: Merrill & Ring v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals this week by a 5-4 vote denied an en banc rehearing in American Atheists, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 10:57 am by Eric Lipman
But it seems the California Attorney General wants her to pipe down. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 9:29 am by Anthony Lake
Statistics show that in 2009, slightly more than one half--56.8 percent--of federal sentences were within the sentencing ranges recommended by the Guidelines--down from 61.7 percent in 2006. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 1:42 pm by P.J. Blount
United States, , 389 U.S. 347, 88 S.Ct. 507 (1967); the statements in this piece are not affected by the property analysis in U.S. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:44 pm by Orin Kerr
It’s important to realize that the question presented in Kentucky v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 4:55 am by Aparajita Lath
This test was laid down in R v Oakes and followed by the Supreme Court in Santosh Kumar Bariyar v. [read post]
The attorney general also claimed that the decision “departed in an impermissible way” from the 2003 judgment Kanane v. [read post]