Search for: "State v. Long." Results 8361 - 8380 of 51,511
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2021, 7:43 am by John Elwood
§ 2254(d) by readily attributing error to the state court in violation of Woodford v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 6:36 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
The test originated in the foundational case of Bardal v Globe and Mail Ltd., a 1960 Ontario decision. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 4:30 am by Josh Blackman
Going forward, states should impose substantive limits on how long emergency orders can last, and establish the power to revoke those orders. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 1:08 pm by Giles Peaker
On to something else that might become only of historic interest before long – costs in Environmental Protection Act nuisance prosecutions. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 10:21 am by Jason Kelley
” We’ve come a long way from that time when our communications were largely unencrypted, and everything you typed into the Google search box “was visible to everybody else who was on that Starbucks network with you, and your Internet Service Provider, who knew this person who paid for this account searched for this thing on Google….anybody who was between your communications could take notes. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 8:15 am by Christopher G. Hill
Any subcontractor (e.g., an accountant or engineer} would then be a proper claimant under the Miller Act so long as he performed his work at the construction site and tidied his office on occasion. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 8:15 am by Christopher G. Hill
Any subcontractor (e.g., an accountant or engineer} would then be a proper claimant under the Miller Act so long as he performed his work at the construction site and tidied his office on occasion. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 7:51 am by Joel R. Brandes
            In Sinnott v Sinnott, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 1901679, 2021 N.Y. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 8:43 am by Kevin Scott and Donna Ruscitti
A blow to cybersecurity and privacy enforcement and potential legislation to come While the case arose in the context of payday lending, the decision in AMG Capital v. [read post]