Search for: "Works v. State"
Results 8361 - 8380
of 60,522
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2009, 4:50 am
Recently, the Nevada Supreme Court interpreted NRS 616C.150(2) in Levinson v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 3:16 pm
In Newman v. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 7:49 am
by Dennis Crouch Correll v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 7:25 am
In Berry v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 5:43 pm
PATEL, Appellant, v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 11:23 am
Co. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:46 am
Speech is obscene if it meets each of the following elements: (1) `whether the average person, applying contemporary community standards would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest’; (2) `whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law`; and, (3) `whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific… [read post]
28 May 2011, 5:34 am
Richardson v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 1:37 pm
A: takings: Sony rootkit is installed, and you’re not allowed to remove it because of the power of the state; similar to Loretto v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:44 pm
This can be achieved only if a passenger's identity is confirmed at the checkpoint. *** A recent case - New Mexico v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:30 am
The case maintains that although employees cannot be specifically ordered to perform on a contract, they may be enjoined from working for a competitor.This article demonstrates how hostile the Lumley rule was to the American ethos of free labor when it was first introduced in the United States in the mid-nineteenth century. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 6:34 am
A panel of the Washington Court of Appeals held in State v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 6:29 am
State v. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 4:02 am
That article was a response to the Arizona v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 2:59 pm
Agency v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:00 am
Stated differently, an accident is "a sudden, unexpected event that was not a risk inherent in the work performed" (Matter of Kowal v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 1124, 1125 [2018]; Matter of Kelly v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 674, 678, 682, 684-685 [2018]). [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:00 am
Stated differently, an accident is "a sudden, unexpected event that was not a risk inherent in the work performed" (Matter of Kowal v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 1124, 1125 [2018]; Matter of Kelly v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 674, 678, 682, 684-685 [2018]). [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:14 am
California and United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 2:11 am
Does Article 5(3)(n) of Directive 2001/29/EC entitle the Member States to confer on the establishments the right to digitise the works contained in their collections, if that is necessary in order to make those works available on terminals? [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 10:51 am
Facts: This case (State of North Carolina v. [read post]
