Search for: "Attorney General v. Superior Court"
Results 821 - 840
of 3,253
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2014, 12:16 pm
The California Supreme Court overruled its previous decision in Gentry v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
Superior Court (1978) 21 Cal3d 829, 835; Hill v. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 3:42 pm
Superior Court. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 1:26 pm
Superior Court, 3 Cal.5th 531, 545 (2017). [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 4:00 am
The Ontario Superior Court, in a decision reported … R. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 9:42 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - An Indiana trademark attorney for Swag Merchandising, Inc. and Devo Inc., both of California, sued in Hamilton Superior Court alleging that Your Fantasy Warehouse, Inc. d/b/a T.V. [read post]
16 Sep 2023, 6:44 am
Hamaday v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 4:00 am
British Columbia (Attorney General), 2014 SCC 59 [1] The issue in this case is whether court hearing fees imposed by the Province of British Columbia that deny some people access to the courts are constitutional. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 9:57 am
The appeal arose out of a writ of mandate case heard before Judge Donald Alvarez of the San Bernardino Superior Court (San Bernardino Superior Court Case CIVSS 810834). [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
Superior Court (1962) 57 Cal.2d 450, 455.)Id. at 23. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:00 pm
In 2004, three separate Massachusetts Superior Court decisions made clear that a restrictive covenant is likely unenforceable where it was entered into prior to material changes -- such as a promotion -- in an employment relationship.Lycos, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:00 pm
In 2004, three separate Massachusetts Superior Court decisions made clear that a restrictive covenant is likely unenforceable where it was entered into prior to material changes -- such as a promotion -- in an employment relationship.Lycos, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
At 11 a.m. today, the Court will hear argument in Vermont v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 7:13 am
” * General Steel v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 8:35 am
The Court held in Iskanian v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:19 pm
Importantly, the Iskanian Court also held that representative claims brought under California’s Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) – sometimes referred to as the “Bounty Hunter Law” or the “Sue Your Boss Law” –can be waived in arbitration agreements. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 9:04 am
Hart In Citizens for Ceres v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 5:22 am
Superior Court (1987). [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 2:51 pm
On March 27, 2008, the Georgia Court of Appeals handed down its 4-3 decision in Lyon v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 2:44 pm
"On appeal, the appellate court affirmed the trial court's ruling.Bronte v. [read post]
