Search for: "Case v. People"
Results 821 - 840
of 52,383
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2014, 10:23 am
For example, I'm not going to recite the facts that ultimately resulted in a case over which the California Supreme Court ultimately granted review. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 5:50 pm
We have just learned of a case that has been pending in Missouri since November, 2006, Atlantic v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 11:12 am
But, just in case, let us make this perfectly clear. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
Clancy v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 2:37 pm
Or, as in this case, for serving such people? [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 9:22 am
In the case of Williams v The London Borough of Hackney [2018] UKSC 37, the Supreme Court has reviewed the Children Act 1989, s 20 and given guidance in relation to its application. s 20 is an incredibly far-reaching statutory provision and is used in the context of local authorities providing services to unaccompanied minors, disabled children, abandoned children as well as children who are on the edge of care proceedings. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 12:37 pm
There's not much of a constituency for the select group of people who kill someone and then burn down their house. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 12:05 pm
You don't see many 82-page opinions by the California Court of Appeal in run-of-the-mill child molestation cases. [read post]
6 May 2014, 2:05 pm
The Supreme Court’s 1983 case on legislative prayer, Marsh v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 12:50 pm
Consequently, if King technically 'serves' the three distinct sentences imposed in this case, they would each mandate a separate sentencing enhancement in the event he is convicted of another felony in the future. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 7:22 pm
" This is one of those cases. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 12:48 pm
On June 22, 2011, the Michigan Supreme Court granted leave to appeal in three cases addressing the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act: People v King, No. 142850, People v Kolanek, No. 142695, People v Kolanek, No. 142712. [read post]
10 Nov 2018, 12:27 am
Guido (U.S., November 6, 2018) (affirming Ninth Circuit determination that "also means," in the definition of employer in ADEA § 630(b) establishes two separate categories: persons employing 20 or more people and states or political subdivisions, with no numerosity limitation) Wages Nesbitt v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 1:05 pm
I agree with Justice Perren that the prosecutor's extended reference to 9/11 in this case was error, and also thought that Justice Perren (rightly) took the underlying issue seriously.That said, the opinion highlights the problem of prosecutorial misconduct and the wholesale inability -- or unwillingness -- of the judiciary to do much about it. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:59 pm
On June 10, 2009, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in People v. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 6:43 am
Case Citation: Nelson v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm
And, similarly, not to care about wiping the slate clean for cases on direct appeal. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 1:23 pm
And, yes, that's a slightly different case that the on at issue here. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 3:58 pm
But even more than the legal analysis, the underlying facts -- in what would is facially just a simple DUI with injury case -- are bizarre and depressing.I am glad that I merely read about, rather than live, that world. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 2:19 pm
Just in case you think that selling methamphetamine is as "cool" as it is on television, take a look at Alan Tinker. [read post]
