Search for: "Den v. Den" Results 821 - 840 of 1,567
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2007, 4:20 pm
" If you keep this commandment, you'll avoid writing things like this 306-word monstrosity I came across today (citation withheld to avoid embarrassing the author): In view of the fact that the insured gave notice of the claimed windstorm damage to his home as soon as he discovered it, which was over 5 months after the windstorm, the insurance companies, in the absence of fraud or collusion, could not successfully deny liability on the ground that the insured failed to give notice promptly… [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 1:26 am by David Vasella
Das Ergebnis des Gutachtens und damit der Ausgang des Verfahrens sind unter solchen Umständen völlig offen und für den zuständigen Richter nicht voraussehbar. [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 9:09 am
"And from Lord Denning:"Counsel must accept the brief and do all he honourably can on behalf of his client. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 5:06 pm
A ação penal se refere à acusação de a distribuidora ter vendido dez mil litros de gasolina aditivada para um posto de bandeira diferente da marca com a qual mantinha vínculo, o que supostamente fere o artigo 11, parágrafo 2º, da Portaria 116/2000 da Agência Nacional do petróleo (ANP). [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 2:07 am by Michael Scutt
  However, in another German case before the ECJ, Petersen v Berufungsausschuss fuer Zahnaertze fuer den Bezirk Westfalen-Lippe it was not justifiable for a maximum age of 68 to be imposed on doctors and dentists practising in the state medical system where it was alleged that the rule was necessary to protect patients from a decline in performance as doctors and dentists got older: no such age limit existed in the private sector. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 3:04 am by Juana Vasella
Die Vorinstanz ging davon aus, dass die Favorisierung der Schweiz massgeblich daher rührt, dass Z seit einem Jahr unter dem Einfluss der väterlichen Familie steht und nur wenig Kontakt zur Mutter hatte. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 12:11 am by INFORRM
” In Jonathan Aitken v the Guardian (1997 CA) Lord Bingham followed Denning: “An important consideration in favour of a jury arises where, as here, the case involves prominent figures in public life and questions of great national interest. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 10:13 am by Daniel M. Gerstein, Douglas Ligor
General Assembly passed the “Uniting for peace” Resolution 377 (V)A. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 10:13 am
Meanwhile, if you want to get a taste of Dutch jurisprudence on the subject of taste protection, here's a link to an English translation of the decision in Kecofa v Lancôme. [read post]
30 Mar 2019, 9:44 am by José Guillermo
Si alguien no está de acuerdo con los dos párrafos anteriores les rogaría me den sus razones, puedo, como cualquier humano equivocarme. [read post]
21 May 2012, 2:05 pm
Portanto, haveria prescrição pois, pela pena aplicada, o prazo prescricional é de quatro anos, nos termos do artigo 109, inciso V, do CP. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 8:10 pm by Douglas
As vias “alternativas” de investigação e denúncia mostram, constantemente, que empresas não lucram impunemente: há sempre um lado perdendo. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 8:10 pm by Douglas
As vias “alternativas” de investigação e denúncia mostram, constantemente, que empresas não lucram impunemente: há sempre um lado perdendo. [read post]