Search for: "Does 1-27" Results 821 - 840 of 11,129
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2021, 11:15 am by IPWatchdog
This week in Other Barks & Bites: a series of Big Tech CEOs meet with White House officials to coordinate efforts on U.S. cybersecurity initiatives and training programs; the Federal Circuit issues decisions affirming Section 101 invalidations of secure mobile transaction claims asserted against Apple, and overturning a $1.2 billion jury verdict for Juno Therapeutics after ruling that asserted patent claims failed the Section 112 written description requirement; the Tenth Circuit decides an… [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
State 2017 Rank 2018 Rank 2019 Rank 2020 Rank Change from 2019 to 2020 Alabama 14 11 12 18 -6 Alaska 29 25 35 46 -11 Arizona 11 15 13 6 7 Arkansas 30 32 34 23 11 California 16 13 17 22 -5 Colorado 42 35 40 43 -3 Connecticut 21 19 23 21 2 Delaware 3 3 3 3 0 Florida 2 2 2 2 0 Georgia 35 38 38 39 -1 Hawaii 24 27 26 28 -2 Idaho 46 46 48 48 0 Illinois 38 42 42 40 2 Indiana 10 10 11 25 -14 Iowa 34 34 33 35 -2 Kansas 12 12 15 14 1 Kentucky 48 47 47 49 -2 Louisiana 9 4 4 4 0 Maine… [read post]
16 May 2011, 9:43 am by Eric Schweibenz
  Specifically, ALJ Rogers determined that the accused Kodak products do not infringe (1) claims 1, 3, 5, 7, and 8 of the ‘964 patent, and (2) claims 15, 27, 30, and 38 of the ‘911 patent. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 10:31 am
Mistake 1: Being Unaware of Your Family’s Finances  In many marriages, one person does the majority of the financial planning. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 8:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Jan. 27, 2022) Plaintiff alleged that defendants Oorah, Kars4Kids, and JOY violated the FAL and UCL “because, contrary to what their advertisements say and suggest, (1) their charity efforts benefit not all children, but primarily Orthodox Jewish children in New York and New Jersey, (2) some of the charitable donations received go toward risky real estate investments, and (3) much of the charitable donations received go toward paying Defendants’ operating costs. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 1:30 am
Under Article 164(1) EPC the Implementing Regulations are an integral part of the Convention and, hence, are equally binding to the Boards of Appeal of the EPO (Article 23(3) EPC) and to national courts.In combined cases G 2/12 and G 2/13 (“Tomato II” and “Broccoli II”), the Enlarged Board of Appeal had concluded – taking into account the legislative history of Article 53(b) and Rule 27(b) EPC as well as of Article 4 of Directive 98/44/EC – that… [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 12:30 am by Anna Maria Stein
On November 27, 2023, the examiner issued a decision rejecting the requested trade mark under Article 7(1)(e)(iii) and Article 7(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 7(2) of the EUTMR essentially on the basis that:a) the mark is simply a combination of presentation features, with an upper view shape and a realistic flat lower surface with feathers, eyes, and beams, which consumers would perceive as typical of the products in question; b) the shape does not… [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 10:55 am by Howard Knopf
Access Copyright does not comment on what may happen were the Board to conclude that such posting triggers the first right but not the second. [read post]
5 Feb 2025, 7:15 am by Unknown
"The Most Indefensible Aspects of DOJ’s Briefs in the Birthright Citizenship Cases (Just Security Blog, Feb. 2025) [text]A new right of residence for stateless people in Belgium – does it offer sufficient protection? [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
On October 27, 2011, the appellant was informed by the RS that the divisional application was not being processed as the parent application had been withdrawn. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:15 pm by Guest Blogger
Halderman, 451 U.S. 1 (1981), written by then-Associate Justice William Rehnquist. [read post]