Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 821 - 840
of 13,951
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2007, 2:01 pm
(P.S. - Was I right or what about People v. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 10:30 am
Interestingly, this is a figure which is comparable to the general damages awarded to Elton John by the Court in the flagship case of John v MGN Ltd [1995] EWCA Civ 23, when taking inflation into account. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 1:10 pm
MCKINNEY V. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 4:56 am
The fact that the Board had considered that the relevant public would view the figurative element as secondary vis-à-vis the verbal elements of that sign could have provided the Applicant with further opportunity to argue that there’s no likelihood of confusion, due to the figurative nature of Applicant’s sign. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 12:41 pm
He flunked out of Seton Hall law school, but he still wants his law degree, and met with a lawyer in the show’s last episode to figure out how he can get it. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 1:16 pm
The ruling came in the case of Register, et al., v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 8:30 pm
Figure 2 illustrates the prior art; Figure 5 is an embodiment of the invention. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 8:44 am
The Delhi High Court delivered a landmark judgment in the case of Manushi Sangathan v. [read post]
27 Apr 2013, 4:06 pm
Included among the cases which have been allowed to move forward, is Harnish v. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 9:31 am
Hologic, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 7:07 am
Trade MarksImage by Riana HarveyMarcel Pemsel demonstrated how difficult it can be to prove the distinctiveness of a figurative mark on its own, when it is generally used in conjunction with a word mark. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 3:49 am
Nfinity IP, LLC v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:06 pm
That question is being disputed during the pre-trial stage of the United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 7:36 pm
It seems to me that the only coherent way to deal with the Supreme Court precedent is to say that one looks to the underlying statute to figure out whether fees are defined as part of costs, but not to figure out who gets them, since if you did that the theoretical availability of fees would be a logical impossibility--jam tomorrow, and jam yesterday, but never jam today. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 9:00 am
Adobe/Flash Player v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 5:37 am
Amidst the ongoing operations issues companies faced due to the virus, US unemployment figures have reached 14.7%. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 1:41 am
And in the case of US patent reform - which faces a make-or-break vote in the US Senate shortly - they could just about be right.PatentHawk wrote:Waldmeir fingered a hyperactive judiciary as the action figure -[M]uch of the heavy lifting on patent reform has already been done by the courts. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 4:01 am
This is only the third case in which such a finding has been made – the other two are Pfeifer v Austria (2007) 48 EHRR 175 and Petrina v Romania Judgment of 14 October 2008). [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 9:05 pm
By almost all accounts, Bush v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 5:14 am
Hart v. [read post]
