Search for: "People v. King" Results 821 - 840 of 2,850
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2019, 2:56 am by INFORRM
The R (Bridges) v South Wales Police case A key test case on the use of FRS has been heard by the Administrative Court. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 1:11 am
Louie Garcia NEW YORK COUNTYFamily LawMotion to Close Courtroom for Hearing To Vacate Child's Adoption Is Denied Matter of Doe KINGS COUNTYCriminal PracticeStrangulation Is Uncommon Brutality; Depraved Indifference Charge Stands People v. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 1:25 am
Pedro Rosario KINGS COUNTYTorts Plaintiff Fails to Offer Valid Excuse for Delay In Filing of Substantially Late Notice of Claim Woolward v. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 11:19 pm
Beatrice Davis KINGS COUNTYTrusts and Estates Consideration Believed to Be Too Low, Not Basis To Vacate Otherwise Proper Stipulation Estate of Paul Saviano QUEENS COUNTYCriminal Practice Defendant Knowingly, Voluntarily, Intelligently Waived Right to Jury Trial, Right to Testify People v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 1:23 am
New York State Division of Parole KINGS COUNTYCivil Practice Officer Directed to Appear for Futher EBT on Issue Of Disciplinary, Civilian Complaint Records Butler v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 10:49 am by Eugene Volokh
Thus, the proper inquiry is whether a ban on gun shows at the county fairgrounds substantially burdens the right to keep and to bear arms; not whether a county can ban all people from carrying firearms on all of its property for any purpose....Where, as here, government restricts the distribution of a constitutionally protected good or service, courts typically ask whether the restriction leaves open sufficient alternative avenues for obtaining the good or service. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 3:13 am by David Cruz
On the eve of the Martin Luther King, Jr. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 11:53 pm
Subscription Required KINGS COUNTYCivil Practice Sufficient Showings of Reasonableness of Settlement, Excuse for Delay in Seeking Approval Not Made Jackson v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 11:41 am by NCC Staff
City of Philadelphia—about if a city can choose not to contract with an adoption agency because that agency will not work with gay couples, and argues that the Supreme Court may upend protections for LGBTQ Americans by reframing religious liberty as an equality issue, allowing people with religious objections to serving, hiring, or marrying LGBTQ people the ability to do so. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 7:17 am by Ron Coleman
Both the 2007 decision and the one from last week (Matrix Essentials v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 5:33 am by The Charge
Entick was critical of the King; he was suspected of having written documents so declaring which he hid in his home. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 4:03 pm
The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court heard the case of the People, Respondent, v. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 4:51 pm
Ct. 846, 148 LE2d 838) (2001) (given that officers had probable cause to believe that the defendant had drugs in his home, it was reasonable to detain the defendant outside his home for two hours while the officers secured a search warrant); see generally King v. [read post]