Search for: "People v. Lines" Results 821 - 840 of 12,237
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2010, 6:00 am by suffolkmcls
The general consensus is that people know the difference between a “face” and a “butt” and that The North Face is ridiculous for bothering to sue this kid. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:50 pm
As she has done with past cases, Jill Browning provides the following same-day analysis of the Supreme Court oral arguments in Bilski v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:50 pm by Dennis Crouch
As she has done with past cases, Jill Browning provides the following same-day analysis of the Supreme Court oral arguments in Bilski v. [read post]
21 Sep 2008, 1:10 pm
Stephen Cantle from Kennedys last week posted an interesting take on the UK line of cases that sees the court encouraging parties to mediate because of the threat of costs penalty if they decline - even where they eventually win at trial. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 1:49 pm
  But that many people "could" be affected doesn't create a public benefit if there's no showing the many people actually are affected. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 5:10 pm by Aaron Mackey
The subject line of the letter references that the order was for records from AT&T, Verizon, Verizon Wireless, and Sprint. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:44 am by Christine Hurt
I have a few thoughts about Chancellor Chandler's opinion in eBay v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
The California Supreme Court had a precedent from 2011, People v. [read post]