Search for: "State v. Best"
Results 821 - 840
of 25,570
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2015, 9:30 pm
For example, during the second dialogue, PPR researchers found that stakeholders’ ideas about a “best-in-class” regulator seemed to “coalesce around a set of six core” areas: “(i) institutional characteristics; (ii) regulatory decisions; (iii) transparency; (iv) public engagement; (v) enforcement; and (vi) evaluation. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 6:28 pm
In Missouri v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 10:29 pm
Whilst this does have a bearing upon Mrs Justice Pauffley's decision, it is not central, and I shall therefore concentrate on the essential facts, which can be stated briefly:1. [read post]
17 May 2020, 2:35 pm
Steel Corp. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 4:19 am
Brokaw v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:31 pm
The recent case of Wissa v Associated Newspapers Limited ([2014] EWHC 1518 (QB)) is an important reminder that, when pleading a defamation claim, it is necessary to set out the precise text of the words complained of and that it is not sufficient to simply state where they can be found e.g. on a particular URL. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 9:11 am
Case citation: State v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 8:41 am
Windsor v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 8:37 am
Walter Ruiz, a lawyer for 9/11 accused Mustafa al-Hawsawi, said this in a statement released earlier today: The judge ruled that the defense request is reasonable on its face and that the interests of justice are served by granting a continuance and those interests outweigh the best interests of the public and the accused in a prompt trial. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 1:46 am
In S v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Case C-304/14) (“CS”), it held that “in exceptional circumstances a member state may adopt an expulsion measure…”. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:58 am
The Secretary of State disagreed. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:08 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 2:15 pm
Best Buy Co., Inc. 2. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 12:00 pm
The 50-year anniversary of Brown v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 6:44 am
In United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2019, 6:13 am
On October 1, 2019, plaintiffs in Brackeen v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 8:00 am
In her recent concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 7:54 pm
Besides Alito’s plurality decision in McDonald v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 11:38 am
State v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 8:19 am
In Davis v. [read post]
