Search for: "Tom Goldstein"
Results 821 - 840
of 1,071
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2014, 10:43 am
[Originally published in slightly different form at SCOTUSblog, together with an excellent supplemental post by Tom Goldstein, as to which I've incorporated a couple of responses, noted herein.]By a 6-3 vote yesterday afternoon, the Supreme Court issued this interim order in an “ACA contraceptive coverage” case brought by a religious nonprofit organization, Wheaton College:If the applicant informs the Secretary of Health and Human Services in writing that it is a… [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 1:31 pm
In addition to those named on the brief - Tom Goldstein, Scott Williams, Pat O’Brien and Carl Cecere - Joshua D. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 5:21 am
Wes describes what happens when a fly enters a no-fly zone after the incision is made;Professor Kingsfield steps out of the celluloid to present Blawg Review #120;The Workers' Comp Insider hosts the Health Wonk Review;And lastly, in the children's department: Dinosaur Musings points to the lyrics of Tom Chapin (brother of Harry) reflecting on No Child Left Behind, and courtesy of Kevin, M.D., this x-ray shows why you teach your children to carry pencils point down, with the… [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 11:20 am
Briefly: Ashby Jones of the Wall Street Journal Law Blog discusses Tom Goldstein’s piece for this blog, in which he predicts that Elena Kagan will be nominated to replace Justice John Paul Stevens when Stevens retires. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 2:22 pm
Tom Lehrer) HPK [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 5:22 am
As I understood the oral argument, the Petitioner, represented by Tom Goldstein, took the view that the government can always watch arrestees from 10 feet away or a similar distance while the arrestees are showering before entering the jail. [read post]
5 May 2010, 6:40 am
Times—SCOTUSblog’s Tom Goldstein predicts that “the Supreme Court would uphold disclosure provisions like those set forth in the DISCLOSE Act, at least as applied to the expenditures by corporations and unions that were at issue in Citizens United. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 7:24 am
Ashby Jones has his own round-up of nomination-related news at the Wall Street Journal Law Blog, and Tom Goldstein commented on the debate yesterday on this blog. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 10:55 pm
Tom Goldstein is right that the Ashcroft v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 7:37 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 5:59 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 12:17 pm
To make matters even more confusing, as Tom Goldstein pointed out at SCOTUSBlog, most of the mainstream media misinterpreted the opinion to say a warrant is required to use GPS tracking on a personal vehicle. [read post]
7 May 2013, 10:00 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 7:46 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 11:24 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 7:58 am
") But back to Tom Goldstein in SCOTUSblog: Opponents of the Affordable Care Act and the Obama Administration... did a tremendous job framing their constitutional argument against the statute to the public, the lawyers on their side were brilliant, and it appears that they had a receptive Supreme Court majority. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 11:46 am
It was started in 2003 by Attorney Tom Goldstein, before he had even made a name for himself as an advocate before the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
28 May 2015, 10:45 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
