Search for: "U.S. v. Merit*"
Results 821 - 840
of 10,879
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2016, 9:20 am
U.S. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:57 am
Martinez, 436 U.S. 49 (1978) (tribal membership); Parks v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:57 am
Martinez, 436 U.S. 49 (1978) (tribal membership); Parks v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 5:48 am
Hammett, 236 F.3d 1054, 1059 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 866 (2001); United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 6:20 am
Maryland, 442 U.S. 735 (1979), whose precedential effect remains unaffected by the Supreme Court’s decision in Riley v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 10:34 am
Baze v. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 5:22 am
Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, Inc., filed their merits brief with the U.S. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 7:14 am
Littleton, 414 U.S. 488 (1974).Khan v. [read post]
21 Apr 2007, 7:49 am
Madison, 2007 U.S. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 1:23 pm
Whether the Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals erred in reviewing the implied bias issue de novo, rather than reviewing the implied bias issue under the standard of “less deference than abuse of discretion but more deference than de novo” as set forth in U.S. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 6:10 pm
MARTIN, 2008 U.S. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 11:30 am
This argument is meritless: The government proved the second element with overwhelming evidence. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 5:33 am
Here: Brief for the United States [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 1:18 pm
In a complaint filed in the U.S. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 11:22 am
Microsoft v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
See Barnett v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 9:24 am
A judge in the U.S. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 4:06 pm
EO-3 may also violate the First Amendment by discriminating on the basis of religion, but our amici argue that Hawaii v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 2:00 am
In June 2010, in Morrison v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 3:11 pm
That money in your pocket is just fine.Rounding out the high-profile religion cases from today, the Ninth Circuit holds that the "In God We Trust" motto on U.S. coins and currency doesn't violate the First Amendment either.The Ninth Circuit holds Newdow's got standing to raise a claim to the contrary -- though lacks standing to object to the federal statute that makes "In God We Trust" the national motto -- but holds on the merits that there's no… [read post]
