Search for: "United States v. Baker"
Results 821 - 840
of 1,397
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2008, 7:47 am
It has decided every case it heard in November except for United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 10:14 pm
But the lowest common denominator was not the organizing principle that got the military justice system into the mess that became United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 10:10 pm
At sentencing, scheduled for Jan. 6, 2011, Kirkpatrick and Emmanuel each face a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and a fine equal to the greater of $250,000, or twice the pecuniary loss to the United States resulting from the offense. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 7:01 am
Louis Cardinals - United States - Law - California [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:00 pm
Baker Elec. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 3:36 pm
Stein, 347 U.S. 201, 217-18 (1954) (citing Baker v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 6:06 pm
Beckham in Baker v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 12:30 pm
United States, 2010 U.S. [read post]
3 May 2022, 1:07 pm
Food-related illness in the United States. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 5:37 pm
Demonstrate familiarity with the legal regulation of CSR in the United States and selected other states, with a focus on the law of charitable giving and the emerging disclosure and reporting laws4. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 9:01 am
Georgia v. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 12:01 pm
Texas (2003), the reversal of numerous pre-New Deal cases protecting economic liberties and property rights, and the reversal of Baker v. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 5:07 am
The action was filed with the United States District Court of New Mexico.In June 2014 the US Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit issued its decision in Leslie Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate, in which upheld the decision of the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois - Eastern Division that author Leslie Klinger was free to use material in the 50 Sherlock Holmes stories and novels that were no longer protected by copyright. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:52 pm
United States, 16-5454. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:35 pm
" United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
S. 873 (1975), and United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 4:03 pm
Carey v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 10:36 pm
In Baker v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government [2008] EWCA Civ 141, Dyson LJ, at paragraph 31, Sir John Dyson emphasised that the section 71(1) duty was not a duty to achieve the result of eliminating racial discrimination as such, or to promote equal opportunity, but a duty to have “due regard” to the need to achieve these goals. [read post]
23 May 2014, 2:00 pm
Co. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 2:57 am
In Baker v. [read post]
