Search for: "United States v. Choice" Results 821 - 840 of 6,596
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2022, 8:27 am
 Franchise Agreement Choice of Forum Clause (Forum Selection) Non-Signatories Bound? [read post]
27 May 2015, 1:38 pm by Marty Lederman
Following up on the recent posts by Joey Fishkin and David Gans on the Evenwel case that the Court has decided to hear, I thought it might be worth posting the argument made by the United States the last time this issue reached the Court, in the government's brief in opposition to certiorari in County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 3:12 pm by Lyle Denniston
  For weeks, the Court has been sitting on a case that would test a state’s flat ban on corporate donations, and is now set to look at that case in the wake of Wednesday’s ruling in McCutcheon v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 12:18 pm by Melissa Murray
United States, which considered the separate-sovereigns exception to double jeopardy, Thomas wrote separately “to address the proper role of the doctrine of stare decisis. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 3:03 pm by Berry Law Firm
Deluca v Brown The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decided a case on April 3, 2018 that changed how the VA decides claims based solely upon pain. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:33 pm by Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.
Some 44 years ago, the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in the landmark case, Loving v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
The standard the City urged for reviewing a facial challenge used language from United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 5:04 pm
For those contemplating soon taking the Examination for Registration to Practice in Patent Matters before the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), be advised that the USPTO is updating the content of the exam in April. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 12:09 pm by Elisabeth R. Connell
Morris of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York issued a notable opinion in the case of Rosenberg v. [read post]