Search for: "A----. B v. C----. D"
Results 8381 - 8400
of 10,374
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2011, 3:03 pm
Koerner & Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 7:35 am
Este “poder de agenda” comprende: a) el definir una situación problemática y merecedora de atención; b) la facultad de obligar a las autoridades a tratar esas situaciones, a deliberar sobre las distintas alternativas de decisión y a tomar decisiones, y c) el controlar la ejecución de las decisiones que se tomen. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 1:17 am
No es habitual que los abogados pretendan utilizarlo en las vistas por varias razones: a) Porque la tradición procesal no cuenta con su uso. b) Porque puede que el juez no familiarizado con tales tecnologías lo interprete como una frivolidad . c) Porque puede que el abogado contrario se moleste o queje. d) Porque puede que tales artilugios perjudiquen con ruidos y disfunciones… [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:58 am
(See Article 43 of the Rules and Regulations.) c) Vacation. [read post]
16 May 2008, 8:03 am
: (GenericsWeb), Europe: New EBA referral T 1319/04 regarding patentability of known medicament for new treatment of same illness: (IPKat), Europe: Patentability of biotechnology in Europe: (IAM), Europe: New EPO Enlarged Board case referrals: T1319/04 Dosage Regimen, T1242/06 Essential Biological Process: (Hal Wegner), Thailand: Compulsory licensing: Affordable health for Thailand thanks to Matrix Labs: (Spicy IP), Thailand: European Parliament set to reprimand Mandelson for… [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 5:00 pm
Type b and press Enter: b ? [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 3:26 am
As regards Deadlock, tucked into the last sentence in Section 8.2(a) is the following, key provision which I’ve dubbed Quick Draw: In addition, if any Deadlock exists which has not been resolved pursuant to Section 4.8.2 hereof, then either the Mintz Group or the Pazer Group shall have the right to give the other Shareholder Group a Purchase Notice as to all of the Shares owned by the other Shareholder Group within ten (10) business days after such failure to resolve,… [read post]
29 May 2016, 9:38 am
Webb v. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 5:01 am
[b.] [read post]
3 May 2019, 1:43 pm
Look at expected uses v. unexpected uses? [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:23 am
B. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 11:24 am
§841(b)(1)(B). [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 10:51 pm
"(2)"An acknowledgement of a Deed, or Speciality, by writing or part payment or part satisfaction (Civil Procedure Act, 1833 (c. 42), Section 5 will suffice if it contains a clear admission of the speciality debt (see Moodie v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
(b) Second, the court must determine from the supporting evidence whether there is a real prospect that, if the stay is granted, the challenge may never be resolved by the arbitrator.[8] The Court concluded that “a court should not refer a bona fide challenge to an arbitrator’s jurisdiction to the arbitrator if there is a real prospect that doing so would result in the challenge never being resolved. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 4:23 pm
(See CFTC v. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 10:12 am
” Grant v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 10:55 am
From Reade v. [read post]
22 May 2010, 6:55 am
Credit Union v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 4:11 am
In Epstein v Cantor, decided last December by Brooklyn Supreme Court Justice Larry D. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 1:34 pm
Additionally, certain types of information are typically excluded from the definition of confidential information, such as information that is (a) is publicly available, unless the information became publicly available due to a breach of the NDA; (b) was already known by the Receiving Party; (c) was independently developed or received from a third-party by the Receiving Party; or (d) required to be disclosed under a court or other legal proceeding. [read post]
