Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V" Results 8381 - 8400 of 12,273
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2018, 11:31 am by Dennis Crouch
 Because the doctrine is not applied prospectively, it does not raise the concerns with unknown consequences that prospective litigation does. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 10:43 am by Eric S. Solotoff
” This language does not suggest the stock would vest through mere continued employment without consideration of plaintiff’s level of proficiency. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 11:15 am
[which begins] I disagree that this was a consensual encounter, and therefore respectfully dissent from the majority's reversal of the conviction on that basis.NFP civil opinions today (2): Jane Ann Hoium v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:59 am by John Elwood
Alabama 13-5380Issue: (1) Whether the increasingly rare and geographically isolated practice of imposing the death penalty through override violates the nation's evolving standards of decency and the Eighth Amendment; and (2) whether, when the jury determines that aggravation does not outweigh mitigation, the trial judge's override of that determination based on evidence not considered by the jury violates the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to a jury under Ring… [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 9:17 am
"The case of The Estate of Tammy Evans v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 5:17 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
A final point: While I would certainly characterize many of my posts as defenses of Cato, as an institution, I have not sought to defend any of the specific actions taken by the Institute’s current leadership or staff. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:26 pm by admin
This is classic procompetitive behavior that should be celebrated, not condemned through litigation. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:42 am by Giles Peaker
Section 23 does not refer to a requirement to provide accommodation under Part VI of the Act for the straightforward reason that there is, as Lord Justice Bean explains, no such requirement. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
The defendants' counsel submitted a letter citing a Delaware Chancery Court decision, R&R Capital, LLC v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:30 am by David Kopel
On Wednesday I examined two aspects of Monday’s 2nd Circuit decision mostly upholding firearms and magazine bans in New York and Connecticut, in New York State Rifle & Pistol Assoc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 11:24 am by John Ehrett
United States 14-602Issue: Whether, at capital sentencing, the government may seek to prove the aggravating factor that the defendant committed previous unadjudicated murders through hearsay statements to police of other suspects in those murders, without permitting the defendant to confront or cross-examine his accusers. [read post]