Search for: "Does 1-10"
Results 8381 - 8400
of 41,679
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2021, 8:20 am
This is applicable to injuries on claims filed after July 1, 2021. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 6:31 am
Rule 4-7-1 then could perform the narrower function of disincentivizing intentional fouls by imposing an additional cost--a 10-second run-off-- for any intentional fouls committed to stop the clock. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 1:34 pm
The tenant (by Toby Van Hagen) and HLPA (by Liz Davies QC) argued as follows: The HLPA’s arguments, supported by Ms Solomon’s statement, were in summary as follows: (1) The Court in Simmons v Castle saw “no good reason why the 10% increase should be limited so as to exclude any type of claim” and so declared that it should apply to all civil claims. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 9:12 pm
Lifescan Scotland, Ltd. at *10 (internal citations omitted). [read post]
29 May 2014, 8:03 pm
Holdings[1][a] “Although the written description does define the ‘data compression type descriptor’ as ‘any recognizable data token or descriptor that indicates which data encoding technique has been applied to the data,’ the preceding sentence [in the Specification] also teaches that "an appropriate data compression type descriptor is appended to the encoded data block. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 2:25 pm
” Abbott, 560 U.S. at 10. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 6:03 pm
” N.J.S.A. 3B:1-1. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 6:41 am
Feb. 10, 2012).Wolf v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 6:37 am
Users “May”, Day 6: Price of Entry, Day 7: Patent Term Extensions, Day 8: Locking in Biologics Protection, Day 9: Limits on Medical Devices and Pharma Data Collection, Day 10: Criminalization of Trade Secret Law, Day 11: Weak Privacy Standards). [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 10:41 am
The Contracting Officer didn’t respond to the request until March 1, 2018. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 4:45 pm
And if they don't the court may find itself overturned on appeal as happened 10/1/10 in In Re Marriage of Tharp, a case I will be writing about in detail as time permits. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 10:16 am
Id. at 9-10. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 10:06 am
Beaty, No. 10-0494/AF, on the recurring issue of the correct maximum punishment for a child pornography conviction under Article 134 clause (1) or (2) rather than clause (3). [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 10:24 pm
§ 950j(a) word-for-word as new 10 U.S.C. 950i, suggesting that Congress did not simply forget this provision altogether.Why does this matter? [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 7:06 pm
So I thought I would have a refresher post for today’s Friday’s Five about some requirements about 10-minute rest breaks under California law: 1. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 5:49 am
If Triton’s financial disclosures prove to be accurate, it will “only” need to pay the $500,000 (plus a $1 fine). [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 6:52 am
On 2 August 2024, the FCA published Policy Statement 24/10 ‘Expansion of the Dormant Assets Scheme: second phase’ (PS24/10). [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 5:30 pm
So where does that leave us? [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 3:21 pm
Our legal system isn’t perfect, but it does work. [read post]
17 May 2019, 8:18 am
” If a company does not have any delinquent filings to report, the new rules encourage that companies omit this section entirely from their proxy statement. [read post]
