Search for: "EXPENSE OF JUDGES" Results 8381 - 8400 of 24,984
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2017, 4:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Bank action, Verizon and its related entities sued the insurers in the D&O insurance program seeking to recover the $48 million in expenses incurred in defending the U.S. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 12:11 pm by Michael M. Lauter
Judge Breyer for the majority felt that the word “cause” in Section 349 was simply not a sufficiently specific authorization of priority violations, terming it as “too weak a reed upon which to rest so weighty a power. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 12:11 pm by Michael M. Lauter
Judge Breyer for the majority felt that the word “cause” in Section 349 was simply not a sufficiently specific authorization of priority violations, terming it as “too weak a reed upon which to rest so weighty a power. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 12:11 pm by Michael M. Lauter
Judge Breyer for the majority felt that the word “cause” in Section 349 was simply not a sufficiently specific authorization of priority violations, terming it as “too weak a reed upon which to rest so weighty a power. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 9:20 am by John C. Manoog III
Under Massachusetts workers’ compensation laws, a person who is hurt at work may seek compensation for several types of benefits – including temporary disability, permanent disability, and medical expenses. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 1:42 pm by John Hochfelder
Plaintiff challenged the award as inadequate but the trial judge denied the post-trial motion. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 10:47 am by Kate McGovern Tornone
The judge left intact, however, the rule’s paycheck transparency requirement, which took effect in January 2017. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 6:34 am by INFORRM
However, he described the existing system for achieving costs protection for claimants as “the most bizarre and expensive system that it is possible to devise”. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 10:09 am by Christopher Kojm, Adam Klein
  The Commissioners all had a wealth of political stories, and told jokes, often at their own expense. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm by Kevin LaCroix
This exception is “necessarily narrow and requires that the employee be working solely for her own benefit” – for example, the exception would not apply with an agent commits fraud that benefits the company at the expense of others. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 6:25 am by SHG
As a litigator, Casetext founder Jake Heller experienced firsthand the frustrations of expensive, outdated, and inefficient legal research tools. [read post]
25 Mar 2017, 4:13 am by SHG
Is it really that lawyers (and judges) just hate technology? [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 3:21 pm by Mitch Stoltz
Unlike other forms of video programming that are available in many different ways, local broadcasts usually require a TV set and a finicky antenna or an expensive cable subscription. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 1:00 pm by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
GO creditors argue that the COFINA structure is illegal and that money currently being paid to its bondholders violates the Commonwealth Constitution’s imperative that states that GO bondholders should be paid prior to other expenses. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 6:07 am by Jim Sedor
North Carolina – Judges Issue Split Ruling on NC Governor-Legislature Power Struggle Charlotte Observer – Anne Blythe (Raleigh News & Observer) | Published: 3/17/2017 A three-judge panel delivered a mixed decision in the power struggle between Gov. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 6:00 am by Doug Cornelius
[More…] Why the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Administrative Law Judges are Unconstitutional by Linda D. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 3:02 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Judge in Teflon was surprised how well respondents did distinguishing brand & common names.Frito-Lay’s survey: 41% said it was a brand, 41% common, 18% not sure. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 2:50 pm by Gregory Forman
Further, as this regulation invests a lot of discretion in a family court judge–whether to make student loans “the exception rather than the rule;” whether to grant what is only labeled a “possible reason[] for deviation”– any trial is only going to be the opinion of that one judge. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 11:07 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  Under the settlement agreement, CIT agreed to pay $2 million to cover the legal fees and administrative expenses of the other unsecured creditors, while giving Jevic’s remaining $1.7 million to pay taxes, administrative expenses, and pro rata distributions to the other unsecured creditors. [read post]