Search for: "State v. David"
Results 8381 - 8400
of 14,238
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2011, 2:08 pm
In balancing these two rights, Tugendhat J had in mind the “ultimate balancing test” as referred to by Lord Steyn Re S (A Child) [2005] 1 AC 593 (at para 17) and guidance from Lord Bingham in R v Shayler [2003] 1 AC 247 (at para 26) that interference of the ECHR right must not be stricter than necessary to achieve the state’s legitimate aim. [read post]
24 Sep 2016, 7:24 am
This week, Daugerdas’ conviction and sentence were upheld, ensuring that the 65-year-old spends a few more years behind bars (United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 11:06 am
Pauley denied (in large part) defendants’ motion in Ganek v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court case most closely on point is the 1991 ruling in Masson v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 9:05 pm
Opp. 16 n.1 (citing the United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 7:51 am
The leading Supreme Court decision is Burson v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 5:00 am
Smith and State Farm, No. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
Regrettably, the scam phenomenon is not exclusive to trade marks and designs, explains David in this post, after receiving a message from the mysterious “European Patent Organization”.* Hurray for judicial sense on product by process claims- Birss triumphs in Hospira v GenentechThis note from Darren is about Hospira v Genentech [on which see the IPKat note here], a pharma-patent case that Mr Justice Birss has decided in light of product-by-process claims. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 9:15 am
Harris and David S. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm
Socialist Workers Party v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 9:42 am
So, with that background, you’ll understand why it is with some trepidation that I turn to recent developments in Naruto v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 12:02 pm
David Logan will be filing an amicus brief in support of the petition in No. 22- 906, Grayson v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 11:58 pm
Full story: Family Law Week.Appointment of the Family Justice Board ChairThe Government has appointed David Norgrove as the Chair of the new Family Justice Board. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 6:30 am
Cohen, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Sunday, September 15, 2024 Tags: Board of Directors, Fintechs, Regulations, Risks SEC Dismisses In-House Proceedings Against Accountants Following Jarkesy Posted by David Peavler and Evan Singer, Jones Day, on Monday, September 16, 2024 Tags: Rule 102(e), SEC, SEC v. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 6:30 am
Cohen, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Sunday, September 15, 2024 Tags: Board of Directors, Fintechs, Regulations, Risks SEC Dismisses In-House Proceedings Against Accountants Following Jarkesy Posted by David Peavler and Evan Singer, Jones Day, on Monday, September 16, 2024 Tags: Rule 102(e), SEC, SEC v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 6:44 am
Kennedy v National Trust for Scotland ([2019] EWCA Civ 648 [£])(judgment not presently available on Bailii)(heard 25 to 26 July 2018): The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal from a decision of Sir David Eady ([2018] EWHC 3368 (QB)). [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 4:03 am
At Legal Insurrection, Cody Wisniewski reluctantly predicts based on the oral argument in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 4:29 am
In a post at the Constitutional Accountability Center’s Text and History Blog, David Gans criticizes the federalism arguments made in two states’ petitions for review of lower-court decision striking down bans on same-sex marriage. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 4:27 am
” Ropes & Gray offers a video discussion of two patent cases that will be argued in the December session, Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 10:51 am
As Burkle v. [read post]
