Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 8381 - 8400
of 13,840
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
According to an article in the ABA Journal, this ruling is the first of its kind in the United States. [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 11:18 pm
” More about the Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 4:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 11:51 am
United States (common law adoption)* State Courts BulletinCases featured:Williams v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 1:09 pm
But DOMA essentially undoes the uniform definition that existed--one that relied on the state law definition (and expected states to give "Full Faith and Credit" to each others' determination when a person moved from one state to another). [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 9:41 am
(The California Supreme Court reached this same conclusion interpreting a very similar statute in Pineda v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 9:09 am
The following day, in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 7:28 am
Tuesday, in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 1:10 am
Widely unnoticed by the public, a fight between Apple and Samsung in two venues -- the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the United States District Court for the Northern District of California -- over the proper way forward for their first U.S. federal litigation is ecalating. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:06 pm
(LA Neighbors United v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 6:59 am
Cabell v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 5:19 am
Target sold 140 Bruce Lee t-shirts in California, while Urban Outfitters sold 4,980 shirts California and elsewhere in the United States. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 4:09 am
United States (2012) 133 S.Ct. 511, in which the Supreme Court rejected an argument that temporarily flooding someone's property cannot qualify as a taking, as a matter of law. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 5:18 pm
In 2011, the California Supreme Court held in Pineda v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 5:08 pm
Last year it produced a terrific 9th Circuit opinion reinforcing that only the United States, not private plaintiffs, can enforce the FDCA and FDA regulations. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:22 pm
Portfolio Recovery Associates, a Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”) opinion from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 11:00 am
Co. (1933, Mont.) 26 P2d 175 [periodic immersion of injured hand into hot water]; United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (1919 Neb.) 173 NW 689 [x-ray procedure requiring injection of contrast substance into the kidney]; Cardinal v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 10:46 am
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 8:09 am
But that usage of "blessing" has constitutional text to support it: We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquillity, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
Goldstein v. [read post]
