Search for: "United States v. House" Results 8381 - 8400 of 12,029
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2010, 8:47 pm by Ilya Somin
In my view, a far better answer to the government’s argument is that the mandate isn’t “proper” even if it is “necessary” and that it runs afoul of the five part test recently outlined by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:49 pm
(IP finance) Withdrawing patent applications – a matter of priority (IPKat)   United States US General U.S. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Senate in 2018 (when Draper’s proposal would be sent to DC), or if the President in 2018 is a Democrat, then Draper’s measure might face partisan opposition in the Senate or in the White House (which has the power to veto any such measure), And all of that is to say nothing about how the creation of six Californias might affect the electoral college and partisan presidential politics, an extremely complicated question in its own right. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 5:00 am
On appeal the Eighth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 9:39 am by Ilya Somin
A broad cross-ideological array of economists and land-use scholars have concluded that it is responsible for massive housing shortages in many parts of the United States, thereby cutting off millions of people – particularly the poor and minorities—from economic and social opportunities. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 8:22 pm by Michael O'Hear
On appeal, the Seventh Circuit affirmed earlier today in United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 12:43 am
In particular, the House that has voted for contempt can certify that fact to the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia, "whose duty it shall be to bring the matter before the grand jury for its action. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 6:47 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Gustafson is married to David Gustafson, a judge on the United States Tax Court in Washington, D.C. who was appointed by President George W. [read post]
9 Sep 2006, 4:51 am
  Here's the language from the 1959 case of Hayashi v. [read post]