Search for: "MATTER OF C A" Results 8401 - 8420 of 36,786
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2015, 5:32 am
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has given its ruling today in Case C-20/14 BGW Marketing- & Management-Service GmbH v Bodo Scholz, following a request by the German Bundespatentgericht for a preliminary ruling from the CJEU back in January 2014. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 8:28 am by Marianna Ryan
A folding bikes' drama has been taking place in EU Court of Justice in December 2018, under the case number C-833/18. [read post]
30 May 2013, 4:31 am by David DePaolo
Many providers fail to provide the required medical documentation using the Form C-4.3, even when specifically directed and despite the significant fee payable to the provider. [read post]
11 May 2017, 8:39 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
We agree, as a general matter, that the extent of a party’s pre-suit investigation or how fervently it believed in its allegations does not affect the objective strength of that party’s litigating position. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 1:01 am by Sai Vinod
(C) No. 122 of 2013), however, withdrew the challenge with leave to approach the High Court. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 3:39 am
It could forego cross examination and still raise the matter in its final brief. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 12:09 pm by Peter Groves
It would not be a matter for the Court of Justice anyway, but it had to be taken as read. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 3:59 am by Donald Barbati
Arbitrator Gifford makes in perfectly clear that any and all interest arbitration awards must comply with the 2% cap, no matter the weight that is given to the other criteria mandated under the New Jersey Employer/Employee Relations Act. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 7:15 am
  The reasons for revocation are limited to added subject-matter in respect of granted claim 1 (alternative claims submitted during the hearing by Nestec were not admitted into the proceedings). [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Norquist suggests that negotiations on dealing with the impending fiscal cliff be aired on C-SPAN and not conducted in back rooms. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Does it matter that the IRS, which considers the taxpayer to exist for purposes of the notice of deficiency, is the party that moves for dismissal because the taxpayer no longer exists? [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 4:16 am by David DePaolo
What's more troubling than the denial of care without any documentation is the failure to fine offending entities as dictated by emergency regulation section 9792.12(a)(23), which provides for a mandatory fine ("shall"):"For the failure to timely provide all information required by section 9792.10.5(a) and (c): $250.00 for each day the response is untimely under section 9792.10.3(c), up to a maximum of $5,000.00." [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 8:27 pm by Mark Summerfield
You have also stated that it is sufficient for the purposes of the Patents Act 1990 if the applicant derives title to the invention from the inventor under section 15(1)(c). [read post]