Search for: "State v. Field" Results 8401 - 8420 of 11,497
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2020, 7:08 am by Thomas Key
 I See Red Artistic ImpressionPart VIII addresses one of the shortcomings of the legal field regarding art: the Multiplicity of Interpretations. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 11:35 pm
 The answer is: not necessarily.Mining social media contentA few months ago, as I was looking for applications of text and data mining  (TDM) techniques in various fields, I read an intriguing study conducted at Cornell University. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 8:33 am by Graham Smith
  They said much the same for use of a trade mark in L’Oreal v eBay. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 6:22 am
" We cited nearly unanimous appellate precedent, from the Supreme Court on down, to the effect that:A federal court in diversity is not free to engraft onto those state rules exceptions or modifications which may commend themselves to the federal court, but which have not commended themselves to the State in which the federal court sits.Day & Zimmerman, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 3:20 am
In India, a part of this area is codified in sections 68-72 of the Contract Act, 1872, and  some outstanding judgments of the High Courts, particularly before and around the 1950s (see for example Damodara Mudaliar v Secretary of State for India, Nallaya Goundar v Ramaswami Goundar and Maniagaran v Maniagaran), contain valuable accounts of how, if at all, the common law principles have been modified by the Indian legislature. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 7:14 am
Florida (08-7412) and Sullivan v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 6:53 am by Robert Liles
HHSC-OIG's Medicaid Provider Field Investigation (PFI) team has been tasked with reviewing allegations against enrolled providers accused of wrongdoing or identified through data analysis as a potential outlier. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC vacates FTC’s decision that Rambus breached antitrust duty by violating JEDEC patent disclosure rules and orders new trial: (Philip Brooks), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (IP Law360), (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (Hal Wegner), (IPBiz), (IP Law360), UK Court of Appeal rules on whether prior art not in the same design… [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:27 am by Brett Trout
” citing Gottschalk v. [read post]