Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 8401 - 8420
of 13,840
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2016, 6:56 am
Procedural History We have been following the critical twists and turns of this litigation which began in 2008 and included a trip to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 8:17 am
In July 2011, the Ninth Circuit arguably veered away from Supreme Court’s position in Sorrell in its own holding regarding a related state statute in Breeman v. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 12:35 pm
Farias is consistent with the California Supreme Court’s 1993 holding in Ramirez v. [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 7:52 am
In fact, Apple and Intel are suing Softbank-owned Fortress Investment in the Northern District of California, and one Fortress front named Uniloc has made such procedural moves in the United States. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 7:18 am
Berner This week, a California court held that the after acquired evidence doctrine barred an employee's disability discrimination claims where in the course of litigation the employer learned that the employee was not authorized to work in the United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
Three years ago, the North Carolina Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 8:57 am
The United States Supreme Court thereafter reversed the state court. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 11:40 am
Polanski should be returned to the United States. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 7:22 am
They do not have a federal constitutional right to counsel to pursue certiorari in the Supreme Court of the United States, nor in other state court post-conviction proceedings or federal habeas corpus proceedings. [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 7:24 am
(“SkinMedica”) appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California granting Histogen, Inc., Histogen Aesthetics, and Gail Naughton (collectively “Histogen”) summary judgment of noninfringement of the asserted claims of U.S. [read post]
12 May 2010, 7:02 pm
Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Title: United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 2:52 pm
California, 403 U.S. 15, 20 (1971). [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:54 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 9:43 am
These and other petitions of the week are below: United States v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 6:31 am
United States, 13-632, Turner v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:38 pm
Lyon Docket: 11-80 Issue: (1) Whether, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19(b), courts may adjudicate and compromise legal rights in land to which the United States holds title without the United States’s participation in the litigation; and (2) whether, in light of this Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 6:55 am
In the United States there are statutes of limitations for most criminal charges. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 6:55 am
In the United States there are statutes of limitations for most criminal charges. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 6:55 am
In the United States there are statutes of limitations for most criminal charges. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
Shortly after taking office, President Trump issued an Executive Order —entitled “Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States”—that directs relevant cabinet officers to deprive sanctuary jurisdictions of federal funding. [read post]
