Search for: "United States v. California" Results 8401 - 8420 of 13,840
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2013, 9:28 pm by Lyle Denniston
  A group of California vineyard operators will be represented in the case of Horne v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 1:52 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Judge Ronald Whyte, Senior United States District Judge, Northern District of California Litigants were Scientology/critic; at each other’s throats, which explains some of the litigation issues raised. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 9:54 am by Lyle Denniston
Among other new orders, the Court issued one in the other pending same-sex marriage case — United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:41 am by Rachel Sachs
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 12:27 pm
Brehm received another favorable trial judgment, this time against Unum Life Insurance Company – the largest group disability insurer in the United States. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 7:57 pm by The Complex Litigator
Chinese Daily News, Inc. took its latest turn today, when the Ninth Circuit, on remand from the United States Supreme Court, issued the most decision in Wang v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:47 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
Perry, the case involving a challenge to California’s Proposition 8 banning gay marriage, or United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 9:49 am by Katrina Diaz
Feb. 26, 2013), the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California denied (pdf) a motion brought by the U.S. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 9:05 am by Stephen Wermiel
United States (2012),  to decisions about the safety of medical devices, Riegel v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:32 am by Allison Trzop
  Anticipating what a victory for same-sex advocates could mean in United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 6:59 pm by Bruce Boyden
But none of those would apply here, at least not under the assumption that the blog host and blog contributors are all located in the United States. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 4:59 pm
Jury: Clear Message The California jury sent a clear message today that Johnson & Johnson and DePuy put profit over safety by awarding Loren Kransky, the plaintiff in the California case of Kransky v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 3:19 pm by Steven G. Pearl
The Supreme Court of the United States granted review and vacated that decision, remanding the case for further consideration in light of AT&T Mobility LLC v Concepcion 563 U.S. ___ (2011). [read post]