Search for: "COOPER V. COOPER" Results 8421 - 8440 of 11,627
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2009, 6:11 am
., writes: The right to have one's lawyer speak (and speak, and speak . . .) at sentencing has been given some lifeblood in United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 1:19 am by war
See for example Re Cooper’s Application for a Patent (1901) 19 RPC 53 and Re Virginia-Carolina Chemical Corporation’s Application (1958) RPC 35). [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 4:12 am by Andres
After all, in V for Vendetta Londoners turned out en masse to watch Parliament being destroyed. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:05 am by Ilya Somin
If that doesn’t happen, the Medicaid case is going to be an extremely important ruling no matter who wins; probably the most important Spending Clause case since the 1930s, or at least since South Dakota v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 11:03 am by The Legal Blog
Lodha Supreme Court of India The Supreme Court in M/s Shiv Cotex v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 7:38 am by Harold O'Grady
“safe harbor” agreement in the case of Schrems v. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 3:43 am by Jack Chin
    Which is why I raised an eyebrow after reading Justice Kennedy's question in Arizona v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 9:35 pm by Nicole Huberfeld
Asking the Court to invent a coercion doctrine to limit the power to spend and/or seeking a return to U.S. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 4:59 am
Williams (York University), Sarah Barker (MinterEllison), and Alex Cooper (CCLI), on Wednesday, December 8, 2021 Tags: Boards of Directors, Climate change, Director liability, ESG, Fiduciary duties, Risk, Sustainability The New DOL Proposal May Change the ESG Game Posted by Melissa Kahn, State Street Global Advisors, on Wednesday, December 8, 2021 Tags: DOL, ERISA, ESG, Index funds, Institutional… [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 11:08 pm by Jon
Constitution, Article V textually and logically allows even for amendment of itself, such as to remove the restriction that the Constitution may not be amended to allow for unequal representation in the Senate, which is a continuing source of irritation to majoritarians who think, mistakenly, that the highest political value is to be "democratic" and that contramajoritarian provisions of a constitution are inconsistent with that value.This is a variant on a well-known problem in… [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 7:31 am by Robert Chesney
  The other charges might spark some debate, however, as they include terrorism (Charge IV), material support to an act of terrorism in the form of providing advice, training, and planning in support of the attack (Charge V), spying in preparation for the attack (Charge VI), and conspiracy (Charge IX). [read post]