Search for: "DOES 1-8" Results 8421 - 8440 of 32,312
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2011, 8:40 am by Jason Mazzone
There is, however, one big problem in comparing the self-arming requirement of the May 8, 1792 Militia Act to the individual mandate requirement of the healthcare law.Read alone, section 1 of the May 8, 1792 Militia Act does appear to mandate that individual militiamen purchase weapons and other military supplies. [read post]
9 Mar 2019, 9:33 am by Sarah Grant
The 21-day window in which the plaintiffs may request rehearing opened on March 8, when two judges on the D.C. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 12:09 pm by Dennis Crouch
(In fact of the patents issued thus far in 2018, the 8 with the most cited references are all Apple patents. [read post]
27 May 2023, 5:50 pm
(Ethics Council Recommendation p. 13).)The Council identified the following threats: (1) Dust generated by truck traffic; (2) vibration; (3) visitor impacts; (4) increased humidity (including those generated by Tonasa's activities and the activity of local farmers; (5) and the possibility of loss of undiscovered art. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 8:43 pm by Dennis Crouch
“The Board’s opinion does not mention factor 8, let alone address Guild’s argument and evidence directed to that factor. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 7:13 am by William Carleton
The House resolution does a very nice job of conveying that, in targeting ordinary citizens practicing rights protected by the First Amendment, the assassin was attacking participatory democracy itself. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 10:50 am
When does in-home questioning by police become custodial for Miranda purposes. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 6:48 am by SJM
Article 8 and public law defences were raised and the County Court recorder dismissed the Council’s claim in a written judgement on 10/1/13. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 6:48 am by SJM
Article 8 and public law defences were raised and the County Court recorder dismissed the Council’s claim in a written judgement on 10/1/13. [read post]
31 Dec 2016, 12:27 pm by SJM
This case, in harness with the SC judgement in McDonald v McDonald, does curtail the circumstances where Article 8 or A1 P1 can be raised in a private context, subject to the comments in our earlier note on McDonald. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 6:21 am by Stuart Buck
" Moreover, to focus on the 25-year rate of return, as Aldeman does, ignores three things: 1) Past performance is no guarantee of future success; 2) the PA pension system now has less assets on Dec. 31, 2009 than on June 30, 2004, which means it lost money over a 5.5 year period; and 3) this kind of variability (i.e., risk) requires taxpayers to pay extra when investments are disappointing for years on end. [read post]
The court began by noting while I.C. 34-24-1-8 does not explicitly require objections in condemnation proceedings to state specific supporting facts, Indiana precedent has long established that such facts must be included, observed by the Indiana Supreme Court’s 1947 holding in Joint Cnty. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 10:32 am by Jon
I Sec. 8 Cl. 8, but Cl. 3, the Commerce Clause. [read post]
1 May 2019, 3:05 am by Liz Dunshee
The adopting release does not mention Form S-8, but the amendments to Rule 411 could impact Form S-8 through general application of Regulation C (per Instruction B.1). [read post]