Search for: "Key v State" Results 8421 - 8440 of 22,474
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2018, 6:55 am by Joy Waltemath
The court also ordered the agency to pay the model’s withheld earnings, concluding that she was entitled to at least $13,768 (Agerbrink v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 6:46 am by ASAD KHAN
Despite the key finding that the grant of bail presupposes lawful detention, Lord Lloyd-Jones subjected his judgment to the caveat that this rule is not necessarily a principle of universal application and is restricted to the interpretation of the provisions of Sch 2 of the 1971 Act. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
United States The Hunton & Williams Privacy Blog has noted the United States recent statements publically blaming the Russian Government for implementing cyber-attacks on the American energy infrastructure. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 1:29 pm by Eric Goldman
He’s Wrong * Senate’s “Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act of 2017”–and Section 230’s Imminent Evisceration * The “Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act of 2017” Bill Would Be Bad News for Section 230 * WARNING: Draft “No Immunity for Sex Traffickers Online Act” Bill Poses Major Threat to Section 230 * The Implications of Excluding State Crimes from 47 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 1:04 pm
It is organized by the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Facultad de derecho y Consejería Presidencial para los Derechos Humanos and will take place martes (Tuesday) 20 y miércoles (Wednesday) 21 de marzo (March) 2018 at the Pontifical University in Bogotá Columbia (Building Jorge Hoyos Vásquez, SJ AUDITORIUM ALFONSO QUINTANA, SJ Floor 3, Carrera 7 # 40b 36 (Tuesday) and (Building No. 95, Manuel Briceño Jáuregui SJ, SJ AUDITORIUM VASQUEZ JAIME… [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 1:49 pm by Joe Mullin
While EFF has long expressed concerns about the free speech implications of the 2008 Fair Housing Council v. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 6:13 am by CMS
Clarke LJ gave three key reasons in support of his conclusion: The structure of the Policy expressly stated that the insured perils were subject always to the exclusions. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 4:27 am by Dave
  In other words, the question was whether the judgment of Gage LJ in Tetteh v Kingston Upon Thames Royal London Borough Council [2004] EWCA Civ 1775 survived Hotak; ie that it remained correct in asserting that a review decision had to be read as a whole and that there was no reason for the reviewer to go further than stating the test and the overall finding. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 2:37 pm by Allison Murphy, Scott R. Anderson
Application of Key Domestic and International Legal Principles to Key Theaters The report then addresses how the legal authorities described previously apply in various key theaters. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 9:42 am by Amy Howe
The centers are represented by lawyers for the Alliance Defending Freedom, which also played key roles in (among others) two recent high-profile cases: Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 12:46 am by Kevin LaCroix
On January 12, 2018, the Supreme Court decided to take up one of these cases, Lucia v. [read post]