Search for: "MATTER OF C A" Results 8421 - 8440 of 36,786
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2020, 6:11 am by Chris Wesner
The Agreement provided, in section 6.1(c), that the Third‐Party Defendants are required to indemnify Mindstream from, among other things, any Excluded Liabilities. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 4:12 am by Chris Wesner
(“Tagnetics”) in civil contempt of this court’s Order Granting in Part Tagnetics’ Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement (Doc. 101) and Ordering Other Matters entered on October 25, 2019 (doc. 119) (the “Settlement Enforcement Order”). [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 11:30 am by Neoshia Roemer
Regulatory and policy priorities within the last year have included the following areas: the federal trust responsibility, Medicaid, Medicare, third-party reimbursement, behavioral health, domestic violence, opioids and substance use disorders, HIV and Hepatitis-C, Federal Tort Claims Act, Federal Advisory Committee Act, and more. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 9:04 am by David Post
" This position is based on a rather egregious mis-reading of the leading Supreme Court case on the matter, Richardson v. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 9:17 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Accessible Canada Act On July 11, 2019, the federal Accessible Canada Act (introduced as Bill C-81) came into force. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 6:31 am
In a prior post (here) we passed along a call for written inputs circulated by the Working Group for Business and Human Rights to be considered by the Working Group in the preparation of its Report on the theme "Connecting the business and human rights and anti-corruption agendas. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 7:09 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Pope will be bringing his expertise to Carbondale and to Springfield so we can put what may be a contentious bioethical matter on the table for discussion. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 12:43 pm by Mark Ashton
  The issue of whether notice and opportunity to be heard was adequate as a matter of civil rights law was fact based and not appropriate for a Rule 12 dismissal. [read post]
  Indeed, Section 8(c) of the NLRA permits employers to express their views on unions, as long as that “expression contains no threat of reprisal or force or promise of benefit. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 7:23 am by Ryan Scoville
This raises the possibility that the State Department can disclose information on matters such as ratification dates and the identities of foreign counterparts, at least insofar as that information is itself unclassified. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 7:15 am by Andrew Keane Woods
I argue against thinking like the anti-vaxxers, which means: (a) comparing robots to the alternative, (b) debunking the idea that this is merely a matter of personal choice and (c) considering debiasing strategies to mitigate our anti-robot biases. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As the Comptroller's determination — finding that Breslin was not permanently incapacitated from performing the duties of a light-duty assignment — is supported by substantial evidence, it will not be disturbed (see Matter of Sweeney v DiNapoli, 88 AD3d 1051, 1051 [2011]; Matter of Murray v New York State Comptroller, 84 AD3d 1681, 1682-1683 [2011]; Matter of Pascale v DiNapoli, 84 AD3d at 1680; Matter of Roache v Hevesi, 38 AD3d 1036, 1037… [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 3:45 pm by Patricia Hughes
In determining whether technology is reasonably available, consideration should be given to factors including: (a) The lawyer’s or law firm’s practice areas; (b) The geographic locations of the lawyer’s or firm’s practice; and (c) The requirements of clients. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 1:11 pm by Eric Goldman
For example, I doubt Wikipedia, one of the top 10 most-trafficked websites, would qualify for this standard.] 2 representatives of small Internet services with <10M monthly registered U.S. users 1 representative with “experience in consumer protection matters related to privacy and data security representing civil society or public interest organizations. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 12:34 pm by Elliot Setzer
The responsibilities of a Attorney at the NSA can include: Advising the Agency on legal matters involving a particular subject matter (e.g., ensuring compliance with constitutional, statutory, regulatory, procedural, and policy requirements for intelligence operations) Analyzing proposed changes to legislation, programs, policies, regulations, or plans to determine impact on the Agency Representing the Agency's official position in legal and legislative proceedings, including… [read post]