Search for: "United States v. Close"
Results 8421 - 8440
of 14,200
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2013, 4:31 pm
United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, et al. closely, we were delighted to see that the Supreme Court upheld the laws of twenty-four states (and impacts every state) which limit the uses of forum-selection clauses in construction contracts. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 8:47 am
Norovirus cases were increasing throughout Europe and the Pacific at the same time. [36] One issue with cruise ships is the close contact between people as living quarters are so close, and despite education efforts, there still seems to be a lack of public understanding regarding how the illness is spread. [7, 14] On the other hand, reporting occurs much more quickly in these situations because of the close proximity and concentration of illness, allowing for the quicker… [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 8:00 am
Jane posted a summary of two United States Signals Intelligence Directives (USSID) continuing Lawfare’s coverage of the latest ODNI declassification trove. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 11:55 am
For example, produce has, since at least 1991, been the source of substantial numbers of outbreak-related E. coli O157:H7 infections.[19] Other unusual vehicles for causing E. coli O157:H7 infections have included apple juice, yogurt, dried salami, and mayonnaise.[20] According to a recent study, an “estimated 73,480 illnesses due to E. coli O157:H7 infections occur each year in the United States, leading to an estimated 2,168 hospitalizations and sixty-one… [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 10:32 am
Ceballos, the United States Supreme Court in 2006, held that public employee speech made pursuant to “official duties” does not have First Amendment protection, and cannot form the basis for a retaliation claim. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 9:51 am
(“Newegg”) in TQP’s suit for infringement of United States Patent No. 5,412,730 (the “’730 Patent”). [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 3:52 am
” At ACSblog, Erwin Chemerinsky discussed Wednesday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 8:07 pm
For example, produce has, since at least 1991, been the source of substantial numbers of outbreak-related E. coli O157:H7 infections.[19] Other unusual vehicles for causing E. coli O157:H7 infections have included apple juice, yogurt, dried salami, and mayonnaise.[20] According to a recent study, an “estimated 73,480 illnesses due to E. coli O157:H7 infections occur each year in the United States, leading to an estimated 2,168 hospitalizations and sixty-one… [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 4:09 pm
Omar (with the United States as the petitioner) and No. 66-1666, Munaf v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 1:52 pm
Commissioner (1989), relying on United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 8:05 am
With Northwest, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 3:04 pm
In United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:04 am
Also deceptive mailings: “Prize Notification Bureau” with “State of California Commisioners of Registration” seal—FTC v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 9:07 am
As such, managers that rely on the CFTC’s Rule 4.13(a)(3) exemption from registration as a CPO, and managers that are registered CPOs operating under the CFTC Rule 4.7 exemption, remain prohibited from marketing to the public in the United States. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 8:46 am
On Monday it became known that the United States Department of Justice (DoJ) unconditionally approved Microsoft's acquisition of Nokia's wireless devices business. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 7:46 am
Thomas v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 7:43 am
” Also arguing in favor of vacatur and remand was the United States, which is party to two treaties with similar conditional clauses: Article 11.18 of the 2011 United States-Korea Free Trade Agreement and Article 1121 of the 1992 North American Free Trade Agreement. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 12:20 pm
However, I think it's likely the Conte Bros. test will be permanently retired in a few months.] ___ Photo credit: Used laser printer toner in a recycle bag // ShutterStockTomorrow, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Lexmark International, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 8:15 am
The one time it came before for the Court was in Gallagher v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 5:37 am
In United States v. [read post]
