Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 8421 - 8440 of 10,394
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2010, 1:25 am by Kelly
(IP Whiteboard) A blueprint to nurture the creatives: it takes Brains… (IPKat) Pigs and protection: Old Spots get the TSG treatment (Class 46) United States US General Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit: Injunction in Bimbo Bakeries case maintained; secret muffin formula still safe? [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 11:13 pm by Steve Baird
A brand new trademark case, recently filed in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, caused my trip down windmill memory lane. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 3:43 am by Russ Bensing
Since immigrating to the United States in 1991, Plaintiff has sued over twenty business entities for alleged accessibility violations, and, in all (but one) of those cases, he never returned to the establishment he sued after settling the case and obtaining a cash payment. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 11:09 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) The Third Circuit has handed down an interesting Second Amendment decision, United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 11:00 pm by Kelly
(Michael Geist) United States US General Motorola and Huawei lawsuit re trade secret theft (Tangible IP) US Patents Is it ‘spare time’ if your employer owns your work? [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 2:56 pm
United States (Docket No. 09-980) appears here.Further information regarding BATCo’s original petition for Supreme Court review appears in a March 1, 2010 posting on Trade Regulation Talk. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 5:44 pm by Michael Atkins
 Do SEE ‘N SAY and THE FARMER SAYS really meet the statutory definition of being “widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United States as a designation of source of the goods or services of the mark’s owner”? [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 12:39 am by Kelly
Phoenix Fence Company (Docket Report) District Court E D Pennsylvania: False marking intent to deceive cannot be inferred from knowledge of the limited duration of patents and expiration of marked patents: Hollander v. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 10:44 am by Carter Ruml
Because the dissent didn’t carry the day, Gates has immediate consequences for private clients throughout the United States who tear down their houses, and build new homes on their property. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 4:16 pm by Colin O'Keefe
- Minneapolis lawyer Dan Kelly of Winthrop & Weinstine on the firm's Duets Blog Ten Reasons Chinese Companies Fail In The United States. - Seattle attorney Dan Harris of Harris & Moure on the firm's China Law Blog [read post]