Search for: "State of New York v. United States"
Results 8441 - 8460
of 16,018
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2010, 6:23 am
United States. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 2:17 pm
Just kidding, but The United States Playing Card Company (owner of the Bicycle playing card brand) and Digi117 aren't. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 8:06 am
See United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
After rejecting Pirate's contention that the "actual malice" standard from New York Times Co. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:51 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Maple Drive Farms v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8] Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 5:00 am
First, the defendants questioned whether the securities fraud claims of the putative class in the case, including purchasers of securities on a French stock exchange, remained viable after the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 11:30 am
United States, No. 1:10-cv-8435 (S.D.N.Y.); Pedersen v. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 6:41 am
As part of its ongoing crackdown on short-term lodging, New York City passed an anti-Airbnb ordinance scheduled to take effect next month. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 8:35 am
See New York Times Co. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 1:33 pm
Before yesterday's New York state court decision, the question whether to reconsider Sullivan would have been moot, precisely because actual malice would have been the legal test in any event under New York law. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 4:56 am
Hitselberger has been charged by the United States of America on three counts of violating 18 U.S. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 6:29 am
Writing for the Opinionator blog of the New York Times, Linda Greenhouse contrasts the Court’s historical reluctance to deregulate corporate speech with the current Court’s willingness to do so in Citizens United and Sorrell v. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 3:36 pm
Furthermore, every State in the United States has a law which says that trusts in real property can be created only by a writing signed by the owner of the property. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 6:09 pm
United States, limiting the scope of its 2005 ruling in United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 3:54 am
” For The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that during yesterday’s second argument, in McKinney v. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 7:47 am
Related posts:US Supreme Court Grants Cert. in BilskiOn Monday, June 1, 2009, the United States Supreme Court granted cert. in Bilski v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:42 am
Plaintiff argues that the [United States District Court for the Western District of New York] based its conclusion that the article’s statements were non-actionable solely on its determination that the assertions were statements of opinion, without conducting the more fine-grained analysis required by Milkovich [v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 7:23 am
Most notably, New York and fifteen other states, and the District of Columbia, filed suitin the Eastern District of New York; and the Regents of the University of California filed suitin the Northern District of California, together with former DHS Secretary Napolitano, who is now President of the University of California. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 7:48 am
The settlement calls for two classes: a NYLL class of individuals who served as unpaid interns for Elite (or an Elite subsidiary) in New York from February 2007 to the date of preliminary approval of the settlement; and an FLSA class comprised of all individuals, other than members of the NYLL class, who served as unpaid interns for Elite or any subsidiary of Elite in the United States between February 2010 and the date of preliminary approval of the settlement. [read post]
